Category Archives: Interesting

Executive Compensation in Winston-Salem: WFUBMC

For today's episode of "Executive Compensation in Winston-Salem" I'm looking at the folks at that megalopolis otherwise know as Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.

My source for the these numbers was Guidestar
and the numbers listed come from the most recent 990listed
for each organization on the site.  So if the most recent 990 is 2006
then I've listed the 2005 pay. Here we go:

For WFUBMC I looked at many of the executives team listed on their website's leadership page.
FYI, one of the challenges with looking at WFUBMC's information is that they've recently restructured, some execs have retired and others have been promoted.  Since the numbers are from 990s filed in 2006 (so they reflect 2005 compensation) I'm going to insert some of the retired executives' data for a frame of reference.  For the others I'm using their current titles but the pay reflects their pay in 2005 in what might have been different positions.

Donny Lambeth, Listed on website as President (Interim) and COO of North Carolina Baptist Hospital –
In 2005 he was paid $388,150 and had $45,625 in benefits and deferred
compensation. Total: $433,775.

Gina Ramsey, Listed on website as VP of Financial Services and CFO of North Carolina Baptist Hospital –
In 2005 she was paid $311,303 and had $38,970 in benefits and deferred
compensation. Total: $350,273.

Len Preslar
, No longer with Baptist but in 2005 he was the CEO.  He was paid $609,240, had $59,668 in benefits and deferred compensation and he had $8,823 in expenses.  Total: $677,731.

Douglas Edgeton
, Listed on the website as the Executive VP and COO of WFU Health Sciences and the President of Piedmont Triad Research Park.  In 2005 he
was paid $414,087, had $52,103 in benefits and deferred compensation
and he had $9,532 in expenses.  Total: $475,722.

Richard Dean, No longer with WFU Health Sciences but in 2005 he was the President and CEO. 
He was paid $854,153, had $179,625 in benefits and deferred compensation
and he had $7,282 in expenses.  Total: $1,041,060.

Executive Compensation in Winston-Salem: Novant

Those of us old enough to remember the late '70s will remember the phenomenal success of prime time soap operas like Dallas.  I always figured that one reason Dallas did so well is that the economy truly sucked at the time and watching the over the top narcissism of the Ewing brood allowed most of us to escape our own miserable lives.  That era was followed by the real-life over the top narcissism of the 80s and exemplified by Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, which was further proof that as a nation we just love to see how the other half, er 1/100th lives. Thus I figured it would be interesting to look at our local big-wigs to see what they make, if not how they live.

Today I'm looking at the folks at one of our biggest local employers: Novant.

My source for the these numbers was Guidestar and the numbers listed come from the most recent 990 they have listed for each organization on their site.  So if the most recent is 2006 then I've listed the 2005 pay. Here we go:

For Novant I looked at the executive team listed on the last page of their 2007 annual report. FYI, there are other high paying execs that aren't included but you can find them if you sign up for a free Guidestar account and look at the 990s.

I would also like to note that I might have missed some compensation.  There are several related organizations bundled under the Novant umbrella and executives are compensated by different organizations.  As you'll see I found that one executive was compensated by two different organizations.  Anyway, here's what I found:

Paul Miles, President/CEO of Novant – In 2005 he was paid $1,486,990, had $331,163 in benefits and deferred compensation and $15,344 in expenses. In addition Forsyth Medical Center Foundation also reports three years of unvested deferred awards of $99,960 in 2004, $104,550 in 2005 and $94,606 in 2006.  Total without the deferred awards: $1,833,497.

Greg Beier, President/CEO of Triad Region (Novant) Forsyth Medical Center – Was paid $825,767, had $382,251 in benefits and deferred compensation and $16,644 in expenses. In addition Forsyth Medical Center Foundation also reports three years of
unvested deferred awards of $58,800 in 2004, $63,150 in 2005 and
$58,365 in 2006.  Total without the deferred awards: $1,224,662.

Jacqueline Gattis, Chief Administrative Officer of Novant – In 2005 she was paid $303,125, had $96,229 in benefits and deferred compensation and $17,000 in expenses. Total: $416,354.

Dean Swindle, CFO of Novant – In 2005 he was paid $682,255, had $114,031 in benefits and deferred compensation, and $13,909 in expenses. Total: $810,195.

Carl Armato, President/CEO of Presbyterian Healthcare – In 2005 he was paid $683,022, had $81,190 in benefits and deferred compensation and $73 in expenses. In addition Presbyterian Medical Care Corporation also reports three years of
unvested deferred awards of $17,581 in 2004, $26,910 in 2005 and
$35,995 in 2006. Total without the deferred awards: $764,285

Stephen Wallenhaupt MD, Chief Medical Officer of Novant – In 2005 he was paid $395,522, had $26,727 in benefits and deferred compensation and $3,692 in expenses by Presbyterian Hospital. In the same year he was also paid by Novant Health Inc.: $88,692 in pay, $35,771 in benefits and deferred compensation and $3,574 in expenses. In addition Presbyterian Medical Care Corporation also reports three years of
unvested deferred awards of $26,950 in 2004, $28,190 in 2005 and
$25,512 in 2006. Total without the deferred awards: $553,978

T. Hayes Woollen MC, President of Novant Medical Group – In 2005 he was paid $101,357, had $47,471 in benefits and deferred compensation, and $3,692 in expenses. Total: $152,520

In the News: Obama’s Grandpa’s Private Parts

I received my Harpers Weekly Review email this morning and as always it contains a ton of interesting info in just a couple of paragraphs.  To give you an idea of how they do it I've included one paragraph below and put in bold what I found to be the most interesting item:


It was reported that Barack Obama's grandfather was imprisoned and tortured by the British in 1949 during the Mau Mau uprising. "They would sometimes squeeze his testicles with parallel metallic rods," said Sarah Onyango, 87, called "Granny Sarah" by the president-elect. "That was the time we realized that the British were actually not friends."
Tony Blair praised Obama's choice of Hillary Clinton as secretary of state. Aleksy II, Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, died at 79, and after nearly 28 years in a coma Sunny von Bulow died at 76. Psychiatrist Robert Zajonc–who correlated birth order with I.Q.–died at 85, and Oliver Selfridge, a student of Norbert Wiener and an artificial-intelligence researcher who invented "intelligent agents," which he called "demons," died at 82. Scientists at Berkeley found that as compared to rich-child brains, the brains of poor children are often more like those of stroke victims, with less response in the prefrontal cortex. "This is a wake-up call," said a
neuroscientist. Researchers studying Canadians found that older brains are less efficient at filtering out distractions, while researchers in Brazil found that medical students are often depressed. A statistician in California said that humans would soon reach their maximum running speed. "Men are still on the upward trend," said Mark Denny of Stanford University, but "they are getting near that plateau." Horses and dogs are already running as fast as they can.

It tells you something about me that I find it more interesting that the British put Obama's grandpa's balls in a vice than that poor kids might have different brains than rich kids.  BTW, I'd totally understand if Obama chills relations with the Brits.

If you'd like to subscribe to Harper's Weekly you can do so here.

Bartering

Fec has assembled a compendium of interesting information on bartering:

Green Apple is making it work in Pittsburg:

Green Apple works through a credit card system. If someone with a Green
Apple credit card buys goods or services, those are offset against what
they can sell to someone else with the card.

Green Apple charges retail prices, so there is no price break when using the Green Apple credit card.

The company also has a string of brokers who spend their days on the
phone trying to hook up potential trades. Last week the Green Apple
brokers had $2 million worth of John Deere commercial equipment they
were looking to unload.

Ithaca Hours are available in New York:

Over 900 participants publicly accept Ithaca HOURS for goods and
services. Additionally some local employers and employees have agreed
to pay or receive partial wages in Ithaca Hours, further continuing our
goal of keeping money local.

From Riding Out the Credit Collapse by Douglas Rushkoff:

The more connected you are to the real world, and the more consciously
you reject the lure of the speculative ladder, the less of a willing
dupe you’ll be in the pyramid scheme that’s in the process of
collapsing all around us at this moment.

Think small. Buy local. Make friends. Print money. Grow food. Teach
children. Learn nutrition. And if you do have money to invest, put it
into whatever lets you and your friends do those things.

Victoria, BC deals with the shortage of Canadian dollars:

Members open an account by paying a registration fee.
When members sell goods or services they earn Green dollars, and their
accounts are credited. When members buy goods or services they spend
Green dollars, and their accounts are debited.

The Bigot Belt

An interesting piece at the Freakonomics blog looks into the "bigot belt" which is the swath of counties from Texas to West Virginia that actually went more Republican from 2004 to 2008 in the presidential elections.  The question, simply put, was whether or not the reason was Obama's race.  The answer ended up being yes, but the details of the research offered some enlightening conclusions.

The author, Eric Oliver, looked at whether it was really just race or perhaps the fact that these counties tended to be in heavy coal mining and oil drilling areas had something to do with it.  Or maybe it was that these counties had a different racial breakdown than other areas.  His conclusion was very interesting: these counties tended to have large white populations in states that were otherwise racially diverse.  From the article:

The answer comes in looking at both the county and the state together.
One of the biggest demographic differences between “scarlet” and
“azure” counties is the racial composition of the state population: 72
percent of the “scarlet” counties are in states that are over 10
percent black compared to only 49 percent of the “azure” counties. In a
multivariate regression analysis using all the variables listed above,
the best predictor of a county’s Republican vote margin is its white
racial percentage relative to its state’s black population size. In
other words, the counties where Republican margins grew the largest
tended to be predominantly white places in otherwise racially mixed
states.

These patterns are consistent with research on individual racial
attitudes. Historically, the greatest levels of racial violence
occurred within white enclaves near larger black populations,
particularly when these enclaves are poor and uneducated. Even today,
whites who live in poor, racially segregated neighborhoods within more
diverse metropolitan areas tend to be more racially hostile than whites
who live in either integrated neighborhoods or within largely white
regions. In more diverse settings, locally segregated whites have less
contact with nearby minorities yet also feel greater competition for
jobs and public goods. The combination of both increased racial
competition and racial isolation seems to be a recipe for generating
racial animosity.

As the author concludes we should not be fooled into thinking that this election has somehow catapulted us into an era of racially harmony.  The fear of "other" has been with us since we crawled out of the primordial ooze, and I fear it will be ever thus.

Think You Know the Third World? Think Again

Below is a fascinating presentation by Dr. Hans Rosling at the TED conference in 2006.  It's fascinating for two reasons: First, it debunks a lot of the pre-held notions most of us have about the third world. Second, his presentation of the data is absolutely mind blowing.  Not a lot of bells and whistles, just really compelling and easy to grasp.  It's worth the 20 minutes to watch it.

Felix – Republican, Oscar – Democrat?

As much as I hate the high political season and all the crap we have to listen to while it’s going on, one positive aspect is that we get to see all kinds of crazy studies done that try to explain the differences between conservatives and liberals.  You know what I mean, the studies that try to explain why conservatives are all anally retentive and wear pajamas to bed while secretly dreaming of themselves playing a part in cheap S&M movies, while on the other hand liberals profess to love everyone but wonder why they have to live cheek to jowell with that smelly immigrant family that just moved in next door. Well, I just stumbled across an article about one such study that explores the households of conservatives and liberals.

The study published in The Journal of Political Psychology doesn’t look at the size of peoples houses, rather it looks at how they keep their house.  In other words they looked at what kind of stuff people have in their houses and what state of order they their stuff in.  Surprise, surprise they found that conservatives are generally neat and orderly while liberals tend to be messier.  Also, they found that liberals keep lots of books and art, while conservatives tend toward calendars, stamps and laundry baskets.

The study also says that conservatives’ living spaces and offices are
well lighted and adorned with flags, especially US flags, and sports
memorabilia.   The article doesn’t mention how the liberals’ offices were lighted or adorned, but I’m imagining lava lamps and posters of Che Guevera.

Not everyone agrees with the findings: 

Political scientist Evan Charney
dismisses links made by the studies between personality and ideology.
"There’s a lot of bad science here," says Charney, a fellow at the
Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy at Duke University.

Well he’s from Duke so what does he know?

Personally I buy these findings.  I consider myself a centrist and my office and living spaces bear that out.  I’m the poster boy for "pile, don’t file" and I’ve been able to live the last four years without a dresser drawer to my name.  I find that piling my folded clothes on a chair next to my bed makes for effective wardrobe selection in the morning.  I have books and magazines stacked next to my bed and desk, but don’t like it when they’re strewn hither and yon.  Yet I wouldn’t know fine art if it bit me in the ass and my musical tastes would make a critic vomit.  Yep, I’d say this study supports my contention that I’m solidly in the middle.

Buy or Donate?

From the Freakonomics blog:

Would you rather donate $100 to a charity you believe in, or spend $50 in your favorite shop?

That’s the crux of an offer
SunTrust bank is making to people who open new checking accounts with
the bank between now and the end of the year: receive a $50 gift card,
or have SunTrust donate $100 to the charity of your choice.

I hope that at some point Suntrust will reveal the results of this promo.  It would be very interesting to learn what people chose to do, especially in these tough economic times.  Here’s an interesting comment they received:

I think the likelihood people would want the $100 donated to charity is greater than if it was thus:

Your account has a $50 annual fee.  Alternatively, SunTrust can deduct $100 and donate it to the charity of your choice.

The net to the customer is the same, but I think people are much
more willing to sacrifice a $50 gift for charity than to double a $50
expense for charity.

— Posted by MikeM

The commenter is absolutely right.  I’m more likely to donate the money that I see as "found money" which is what the promotion would be, versus money being deducted from my account even though the end result is the same: $50 out of my pocket.

Voices in Your Head?

I came across this article about a company using a microwave ray gun to beam noises directly into peoples’ heads and it stopped me cold.  I mean after reading these paragraphs tell me you can’t think of some amazing applications for this technology:

A US company claims it is ready to build a microwave ray gun able to beam sounds directly into people’s heads.

            
       
   
       
            
            
               

The
device – dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) –
exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses
rapidly heat tissue, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be
detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce
recognisable sounds.

            
       
   
       
            
            
               

The device is aimed for military or crowd-control applications, but may have other uses.

            
       
   
       
            
            
               

Lev
Sadovnik of the Sierra Nevada Corporation in the US is working on the
system, having started work on a US navy research contract. The navy’s report states that the effect was shown to be effective…

Sadovnik says the technology could have non-military applications.
Birds seem to be highly sensitive to microwave audio, he says, so it
might be used to scare away unwanted flocks.

            
       
   
       
            
            
               

Sadovnik
has also experimented with transmitting microwave audio to people with
outer ear problems that impair their normal hearing.

I’m sure that many people would instantly think of noble uses for this technology, for instance helping the hearing impaired.  Me?  The first thought I had was how much fun it would be to mess with people with this thing.  Have a boss you can’t stand?  Think of the turmoil you could cause him by beaming things like, "This is God.  I am preparing to smote thee for being such a jerk to fill in your name and anyone else you like at work.  Your only chance at redemption is giving them annual 20% raises.  Oh, and I’m thinking of another flood so I need you to head to Home Depot to start your ark preparations."  If you do this a couple of times a day for a week you’ll either be rid of the jerk after he checks himself into the hospital or you’ll have a much fatter pay check.

Lest you think I’m truly disturbed I won’t tell you the things I thought of that I could beam to my kids.