Author Archives: Jon Lowder

Just Show Up

Most of us have heard the saying that 90% of success is just showing up sober (I’m paraphrasing here).  Personally I always equated that saying with success at work, and it never occured to me that the saying also applied to my personal life until Celeste and I attended a small event at the youngest’s school last week.

All the kids in Justin’s class had written some short stories and parents were invited to sit in and listen to the kids read the stories out loud on Friday afternoon.  When we arrived we found the kids divided into small groups of about five and the parents were asked to sit in with the group that included their child.  Celeste and I were the only parents in our group so we heard Justin read his story and then the four other children read theirs.  We were encouraged to ask each of the kids questions about their stories so we learned that the one girl in the group enjoys fantasy stories (i.e. pre-teen, chick-lit), one of the boys will only willingly read books about skateboarders (thus his report about Bam Margera) and the other boy was from Mississippi and had moved here after Katrina (his was an autobiographical account of his family’s experience after the hurricane). With our own son we learned that he has an unbelievably strong grasp of fantasy weaponry ala Halo, and a kind of Sgt. Rock bravado in his imagery.  I for one was stunned by his ability to paint such a vivid picture of his own fantasy world, and to be honest I was shocked by his fatalistic acceptance of casualties among his troops; he fully expected people to die.

Given the trouble we’ve had with getting Justin to write anything even semi-expressive in his reading response journal this year it really was a surprise to hear him read a story he had written that contained so much oomph.  He’s a quiet kid and not often open to sharing his thoughts and it was obvious he was embarassed reading his story out loud, so it was great to find his work to be so expressive.

The biggest surprise of the day came right before we left.  The kids wanted to show off their prowess at a multiplication game that features two teams of equal size, a teacher shouting out a multiplication question to a representative of each team and the two kids racing to see who can shout the answer first.  The kid who answers first stays in place for the next question and the other kid sits down.  The team that has someone still standing at the end wins. Justin’s class is undefeated in the competition, but the shock to me was that Justin was considered one of the fastest in his class.  For two years Justin struggled to finish written multiplication tests in the alloted time and only towards the end of last year was he able to do it consistently, so for him to be one of the fastest in his school is quite an achievement.

Of course Justin told us nothing about all this.  We’re lucky he gave us two days’ notice about the reading and if we hadn’t attended the reading we never would have known that he’d gone from struggling with multiplication to excelling at it.  In other words, by just showing up we learned something new and great about our youngest child.

Hopefully this lesson won’t be forgotten, by me in particular.  I have an infamously short attention span and I’m known to spend a lot of time "in my head", but if I can remember to just show up and pay attention I might not totally screw up my kids’ teenage years.  If nothing else I’m sure I’ll learn exactly how much they dislike me and how big a dork they think I am. 

The Snotmobile

Right now if I could invent anything it would be a car engine that could run on snot.  My sons have been generating massive amounts of mucus for the last couple of months (not sure why) and now that it’s allergy season it’s my turn.  I figure by myself I’m producing gallons of this stuff a day, so fueling our vehicle would be good for the pocketbook and our contribution to the "war on global warming."  I could also share the technology with all parents of toddlers, those little 24 inch humans who would be the equivalent of Saudi Arabia in the snot economy.

Speaking of the "war on global warming", does it bother anyone else that we continually declare war on everything?  We have the "War on Drugs", the "War on Childhood Obesity", and the oxymoronic "War on Domestic Violence."  Will someone please declare war on the practice of declaring war on the banal?

Keeping Track of Congress Just Got a Lot Easier

One of the frustrations I’ve had in keeping tabs on what my Congress-critters were doing was that I was pretty much dependant on news outlets to keep me abreast of the action in Washington.  For one thing I didn’t know anyone who had the time to wade through all the information unless their job pays them to do so.  For another, until the advent of the web you had to subscribe to the Federal Register to access all of the info, and even after the web came along it was a tedious process to go and browse the online information.

Now thanks to a project called OpenCongress you can subscribe to RSS feeds dedicated to any Representative or Senator and have their every action sent to you as it’s updated.  I just added the feed for Virginia Foxx to my Netvibes page and now I can see how she’s been voting recently, and in the future I’ll be able to see her votes as soon as they happen.  Even better, OpenCongress has pages that pull together information, including descriptions of the bills, articles about the bills and other data on each bill in one easy to read page.  So here’s one of the recent feeds for Madame Foxx:

Rep. Virginia Foxx [R, NC-5] voted ‘Nay’ on the question: On Passage: H R 1362 Accountability in Contracting Act regarding H.R.1362 Accountability in Contracting Act

If you click on the link to the Act you can read all about it which makes it easy to see how my representative voted and to determine if I agree with her.  Since I think she’s a dingbat I doubt I’ll agree with her much, but at least with this tool I’ll be able to make my judgements based as much on her votes as for her less than appealing public appearances.

Local News, Bloggers and Media

We’ve had two big local news stories over the last week and a half.  One was about a local TV news anchor who allegedly drove drunk, ran over a man and killed him and the other was about a Boy Scout who got lost in the woods for three days.  The latter became a national story and happily the Boy Scout was found alive today and reunited with his family.

An interesting thing happened with the first story.  A few days after Tolly Carr allegedly commited the crime of driving while intoxicated and running over a pedestrian rumors started floating around that Carr had commited suicide.  We heard it from our son, who’d heard it from his bus driver, who in turn heard it from a friend via a cell phone call.  We checked the news and saw nothing about it and quickly we forgot about it.  The next day I was reading the blog of Ken Otterbourg, the Winston-Salem Journal’s managing editor, and he posted a piece about the rumor, how many phone calls they received about it and the effort they made to run it down.  What made this so interesting is that the rumors never made the newspaper itself, but because he has a blog that discusses the inner workings of the newspaper Otterbourg was able to "cover" the rumor from the paper’s perspective.  It was fascinating to me that the rumor had become so widespread that the newspaper had to investigate, and it was also of interest to see how a professional news organization handles such a case.

The Boy Scout story generated some interesting developments as well.  I was in the barber shop when one of the news reports mentioned that the boy had been left behind with one of the counselors while the rest of the group went for a hike.  One of the men in the barber shop instantly said, "Why they leavin’ a young boy alone with a Scout leader like that? I think we have an idea why that boy might have run off."  The implication, of course, was that the scout leader had been doing something untoward with the boy and the boy fled the scene.  Later that evening I was catching up on my blog feeds and I noticed that one had a post about the Boy Scout case and made the same assertion that the barber shop patron had made.  The difference, of course, is that the blog was out there for the world to see and from my own experience I knew this post would be read by others and the writer would be taken to task for publishing such accusations without a shred of proof.  Since I consider the writer a friend I was going to write him and advise him that he might want to re-think the post, but when I clicked the link for the post it had already been taken down.  It turns out Ed Cone had beaten me to the punch, as he writes in his post Local Blogging and Responsibility.

I can’t help but notice the relationship between these two cases.  One features a mainstream newspaper editor using a newly found tool, his blog, to delve into the evolution of a rumor and how his organization deals with it.  The other features an "amateur" writer with a local readership and a newly found responsibility to think twice before tapping "publish" or risk becoming intimately familiar with the terms libel and slander.  Somewhere in there I think we’ve found the face of local news in the future.

I’m an Idiot. I Thought This Was the Texas Tech Contingent Cheering for Belmont Boys

Texas Tech Contingent Cheering for Belmont Boys
**Update** I’m an idiot.  As you’ll see from my post below, made from my smartphone during the game between Georgetown and Belmont, I thought those folks in red were Texas Tech fans.  It was in fact the Belmont contingent.  During the game I was so impressed that the Texas Tech fans would be so enthusiastic in their support of the underdog Belmont team.  It wasn’t until leaving that I saw that their shirts all said Belmont on them.  The sad part is I wasn’t even drinking!

Best part of the game came towards the end.  The Georgetown fans, who would like to think of themselves as Dookie-like, started chanting "Where is Belmont?" and a heartbeat later the Belmont fans started chanting "What’s a Hoya?"

Last note about the game.  How cool is it that Belmont, with an enrollment of 4,500 students, easily had the largest and loudest contingent of the four schools playing in the day session in Winston-Salem.  They dwarfed the Boston College, Texas Tech and Georgetown crowds.  Actually the largest contingent after the Belmont crowd were the UNC fans who were waiting for the night session.  You could recognize them in their varied array of powder blue shirts and hats, khaki shorts and slacks, and the remnants of cheap wine and Velveeta crusted to their lips from their tailgating soirees.

Original post made from my smartphone: The Texas Tech crowd is cheering very loudly for Belmont, as are all the UNC fans who are at the day session.  That whole section of red you see to the right has yet to sit down.
As I thumb-type this the Belmont kids are up 9-4 with only 35:51 left in the game!

News Flash: We Boys are Crotch Watchers

I know you ladies will find this shocking, but there’s now some proof that most men won’t look you in the eyes when they’re talking to you.  In 2005 two researchers did an eyetracking study on 255 people, or in other words they tracked where people looked on a screen when browsing the web, and came up with some interesting info.  The full article is here, but for our purposes we’ll concentrate on this part:

When photos do contain people related to the task at hand, or the
content users are exploring, they do get fixations. However, gender
makes a distinct difference on what parts of the photo are stared at
the longest. Take a look at the hotspot below.

Although both men
and women look at the image of George Brett when directed to find out
information about his sport and position, men tend to focus on private
anatomy as well as the face. For the women, the face is the only place
they viewed.Brettcrotch

This
image of George Brett was part of a larger page with his biographical
information. All users tested looked the image, but there was a
distinct difference in focus between men and women.

Coyne adds
that this difference doesn’t just occur with images of people. Men tend
to fixate more on areas of private anatomy on animals as well, as
evidenced when users were directed to browse the American Kennel Club
site.

We really are a bunch of dogs.

Found via Boing Boing.