Secular Humanism

Dana Blankenhorn writes a long piece on secular humanism that touches on many topics of interest in America right now.  Intelligent design, the separation of church and state, science vs. belief, etc. As usual I don’t agree with some of what he says, do agree with much of it, and think alot because of it.

A couple of paragraphs really grabbed me.  Here’s the first:

Faith is meaningless if it is compelled. If a soup kitchen feeds you,
then demands you pray to its God in order to take that soup, is your
prayer really worth anything? If a school demands your child recite a
specific prayer, to a specific God, at a specific time, in a specific
way, where is the God in that? Where is the faith in that child?

This paragraph provoked a tangential thought process that helped me articulate my problem with evangelism. It is this:

If you need to tell me, repeatedly, why your religion (notice I said religion, not God) is so great then my first instinct is to look for its weakness.  On the other hand if while having lunch together I hear you talk about the wonderful experiences you’ve had while volunteering at your church’s soup kitchen, see your eyes light up when you talk about the great people you’ve met while building homeless shelters, sense the community you feel whenever you chaperone your church’s youth group trips, I see you as a representative of all that is good with your religion.  I may not join (do I really need to for you to have fulfilled your evangelistic mission?) but I will come to believe that your church is a true community of good, of doing what God put you, us, on Earth to do.

The next part of Dana’s post that grabbed me was this:

America is also a nation of 10,000 faiths, all actively practiced, all loudly proclaimed.

We have Bahai and Buddhist temples, Shiite, Sunni and Black Muslims.

We have Maronite and Roman Catholics, Russian and Greek Orthodox. We
have Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform Jewish temples. We have a
wealth of faiths invented right here – Mormons and Southern Baptists –
as well as churches that get by merely on their ministers’ brand name…

America is the most religious nation in the history of the planet.
We’re a Christian nation, but we are also a Buddhist one, and a Muslim
one, and a Hindu one. When God hears the prayers of America, he or she
hears dozens of languages, a great cacophony. And then there are the
atheists and agnostics who either don’t know God or don’t care.

All this is worth cherishing. All this is worth savoring. All this
is worth protecting. This is our legacy, it’s what makes us special.

My thought tangent here diverted to the damage that the exclusionary aspect of many religions is doing to our society.  If you’re not with us then you’re against us.

Those same people who stand there and proclaim the greatness of their religion also preach that their’s is the only way.  If I, or you, do not join them we will not be saved.  I will be excluded.  I am an outsider.

This kind of thinking is human in that almost all people surround themselves with people like themselves.  We fear people who are different. Unfortunately many leaders understand how to take advantage of this fear. They use this fear to manipulate us for their own ends, whether it be the furthering of their particular ideology or the gain of power and influence in the secular world.

As Dana points out, the true power of America is that we accept all faiths under our umbrella.  We recognize each individual’s right to believe in their own religion, or to not have a religion.  We are inclusive, not exclusive.   We have overcome our natural fear of "others", although it has never happened quickly (ask the Irish and Italian immigrants of the late 19th and early 20th century).

America is definitely a nation of economic haves and have nots, but it is also a nation that has led the way in offering personal liberty.  It is by nature an inclusive society.

My fear right now is of those leaders that would claim America for their particular faith.  America is NOT a Christian nation, nor a Muslim nation, nor a Hindu nation.  It is a nation that accepts all of these faiths and more.  It is a scaffold that supports all religions and none.

To close the loop let me say this:  I do not want to evangelize for America, for the same reason that I don’t want someone to evangelize their religion to me.  I want to lead my life so that I can be a representative of what is good about America.  I want my actions to speak for my belief.

Honey, Do You Want to Starve?

According to this article it seems that the owner of a small painting company is at risk of losing a $5,000 contract with a school system because he fired a woman and was honest (or dumb) enough to leave a voice mail saying he was firing her because she’s a woman, not for any legitimate work-based cause.  It gets better.

In the message the guy said that his wife found out he had some "girls" working for him and wouldn’t stand for that.  Seems she’s the jealous type.  So, he said, to avoid conflict at home he decided to fire the women.

Oh, there are so many things I could write here.  I’ll just limit it to these:

  1. Dude, I admire your honesty but what were you thinking?  It can’t be a surprise that your wife is jealous, so why put yourself in that position?  It sounds like you are probably an honorable person so I’d recommend keeping the employees since they didn’t do anything wrong (i.e. they held up their side of the bargain) and dealing with your issues at home.
  2. Maam, do you think in this day and age your husband will be able to do his job without encountering any women?  Are you going to fly into a jealous rage every time he talks to a female customer?  Do you want him to not hire the best available worker just because she’s a woman?  Do you want to eat and have a roof over your head?
  3. Have either one of you heard of marriage counseling?  I think you might need it.

Winston-Salem Journal Allowing Comments

While it isn’t really full-fledged blogging or "citizen journalism", it is a step in the right direction.  The Winston-Salem Journal announced yesterday that they are allowing comments on "certain hand picked stories."

Here’s some of the announcement:

The point of this is
to encourage participation in the news. So if there is a particular
story, somebody’s column or a topic you would like to have comments
available for all the time, email us at webstaff@journalnow.com and let us know. We’re new to this "two-way news" thing too.

As part of the announcement they also highlighted a story that has comments enabled.  In my excitement I decided I had to post a comment. Here’s the text I found in the comment posting window:


Comments will be posted only with the name you enter, but please give us an email address so we may contact you.

Publishing comments is at the sole discretion of this Web site and subject to our Terms and Conditions of Use Agreement.
By posting to this forum, you assume responsibility for your
communications and the consequences of posting them. Comments must not
be obscene, profane, sexually explicit, libelous, slanderous,
defamatory, harmful, threatening, illegal or knowingly false, and must
otherwise adhere to the requirements of the Terms and Conditions of Use Agreement.

Comments should focus on issues raised in the article.  Try to keep comments to 50 words or less.

All
comments are reviewed before posting. Therefore, there will be a delay
period between submission and display of accepted items on the Web
site.
      

Very interesting.  I think they’ve been watching what’s been going on at the Greensboro News & Record, because they have gotten out front with a policy on comments (what’s acceptable, we can refuse to allow comments we consider nasty, etc.) and they are allowing anonymous posts which is an issue that the N & R wrestled with publicly.

While I’m not sure about the 50-word limitation, it will help limit some ranting.  Still I think maybe 150 words would be a little more appropriate.  They do have one neat little tool in their comment window:  they limit you to 500 characters so they put a counter in the window showing you how many characters you have left.  Very helpful!

I’m also not sure about the "reviewed before posting."  I have a feeling it’s a CYA thing, but I’d rather see the comments post instantly and then have them removed if they are inappropriate.  Why?  Because I think it makes the process transparent and preempts the people who will automatically cry liberal (or conservative) bias on the part of the editors if their comments aren’t posted.

All in all I’m pleased as punch to see this.  Now how about getting Carl Crothers (Executive Editor), Jim Laughrun (Managing Editor) (oops, he’s retired), Ken Otterbourg (Asst. Managing Editor) and/or Charlie Elkins (Asst. Managing Editor) blogging like their N&R counterpart John Robinson?

If I Do Indeed Have a Weird Sense of Humor, Then These May Not be Funny

I found these Farklines pretty funny:

  1. "In theory, climbing a tree is a great way to escape a bear attack. Of course, in theory, Communism works"
  2. "Al-Jazeera refuses to run PETA ads because they depict cruelty to
    animals. Regularly scheduled news footage of beheadings and suicide
    bombings still okay"
  3. "Journalists dismayed that their shoddy reporting techniques and political bias have caused a credibility crisis in journalism"
  4. "Victory confetti drops to field prematurely in thrilling arena football semifinal viewed by dozens"
  5. "Passengers sue airline for rough landing. Accountants calculating
    cost-effectiveness of just letting the damn thing crash next time"
  6. "Orlando airport allows passengers to buy $80 annual pass that will
    guarantee no random security pat-down. What could possibly go wrong?"
  7. "Poachers decide to steal sheep, grab the biggest one they can find in
    the group. Realize after leaving that real sheep don’t bark"

Source: Fark.com

Mud Cats Champs, 19-18

My youngest’s (Justin’s) baseball team, the Mud Cats, won the Southwest Forsyth Little League coach pitch championship 19-18 in extra innings on Saturday.  Best of all for Justin is he ended the year with one of his best games, going 3-4 with a huge hit to left center in the last inning that put the winning run on second.  Two hits later his team won the whole enchilada.

In coach pitch normally if a kid makes contact he’s going to get on base.  The Mud Cats and the Sand Gnats were the defensive exception in the league.  Both teams made great plays in the field, so the kids really had to hit to get on base.  That’s why the last inning was so impressive;  it was the bottom half of the Mud Cats order and four straight kids hit the ball hard to drive in the winning run.

Many thanks to the coaches, who did a wonderful job teaching the boys the fundamentals and making sure the game was fun, win or lose.

Smart People

Has anyone else noticed that when writing your blog it is so much easier to link to stupid people, or at least people doing stupid things, and make fun of them than it is to identify smart people and write about why you think they are? I even created a category called "Stupid People." Maybe it’s just me giving into that age-old temptation to criticize others in order to feel better about myself. 

Well, it hit me like a brick today that I’ve been the beneficiary of many smart people’s wisdom over the years, but since I began setting up my RSS feeds a while back I think that I’ve probably accelerated that process 10-fold.  There are some truly brilliant people out there, and I’m constantly humbled by what they know and how much I have yet to learn.

So with this post I launch the "Smart People" category.  It is not a comprehensive list, and it is limited to those I can link to online, so it precludes many of the true geniuses I’ve known for a long time.  I also want to point out that I often disagree with many of the people I’ll be listing, but that’s okay because their convictions are informed by a true thought process that is exhibited consistently in their writing.

Today I begin with a list in no particular order.  Later I hope I’ll be able to tell you why I think they’re brilliant, but for now just take my word for it:

Dana Blankenhorn
Umair Haque
Rex Hammock
Patrick Eakes
Chewie (wish I knew her real name)
Ed Cone
John Robinson
Lex Alexander
David Hoggard

That’s a start.