Did anyone else appreciate the irony of Baptist Hospital having to settle a lawsuit with their employees over health benefits? From the article:
The lawsuit said that Baptist "violated the duties, responsibilities and obligations imposed upon them as a fiduciary" under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, or ERISA.
The lawsuit accuses Baptist of requiring employees to pay more for services rendered at the hospital through MedCost than alternative health-care plans would have, including higher co-payments and lower discounts. It also said that employees paid higher fees than those required by MedCost from other corporate clients.
You may remember that I complained about my wife's MRI at Baptist last fall, so let's just say I'm sympathetic to the employees.