Good News at the Day Job – PTAA Wins Two National Awards

Today was a banner day at the office.  We found out that our association, Piedmont Triad Apartment Association, was named the winner of two Paragon Awards by the National Apartment Association.  In our world that's like winning two Oscars.  We won in the following categories:

Community Service – This was for our Labor of Love project at The Children's Home in February, 2010.

Communications – For our annual food drive for Second Harvest featuring a really cool partnership with WXII, Winston-Salem Dash and Greensboro Grasshoppers (and a special shout out to Mayors Joines and Knight for filming the commercials for us).

I can't tell you how proud I am to be part of a great team including the staff and volunteer leaders at PTAA.

Verbs

Reading one of Lenslinger's posts I came across some valuable writing advice:

"Ease off the adjectives. Good writing is all about the verb. Forget everything the jackholes with the MFA's and elbow patches have to say. You're a blue collar, Southern writer and they can't teach that shit in schools. Fiction, Memoir, you can write it all – but you CANNOT hold back. Readers will see right through it and you'll be stuck dodgin' lion piss 'til your back finally gives out…"

If I had an ounce of free time I'd also wonder how to score an invite to the next BOOKUP.  Sounds like a lot of fun with some very interesting folks.

Sometimes I’m a Self Hating Loser

I was catching up on my reading and came across this post by Seth Godin titled "Turning the habit of self-criticism upside down."  I've done enough 360 reviews to know that he's spot on when he writes:

When it's time to write a resume or talk to a boss or discuss a project glitch with colleagues, the instinct is to spin, to avoid a little responsibility, to sit quietly. Put a best face forward, don't set yourself up.

When reviewing just about anything you've done with yourself (in your head), the instinct is to be brutal, relentlessly critical and filled with doubt and self-blame.

What's equally interesting to me is how those habits are affected by the people you interact with.  For instance if you work for someone who's hypercritical you're much less likely to be self-critical because you can be sure that your hyperritical boss is going to pile on.  That's why I've never understood leaders/bosses who are hypercritical – you might get short term gains from running a tight ship, but in the long run you're going to have a team of people who work defensively and cover up small problems that will fester and grow into big problems.

I also believe that hypercritical personalities can actually inhibit the performance of those around them.  For instance I play a lot of tennis and my lifelong modus operandi is this: I can play four straight games of stellar tennis and then throw in one or two bad points and fall apart because all I can think about is what a loser I am for making that one mistake.  Pretty soon I've spent so much energy beating myself up that I've turned one or two bad points into a lost set or lost match. Over the years I've played on lots of teams and had literally dozens of doubles partners, and since I'm a head case to begin with, if you give me a partner who's going to get on me when I make mistakes then I'm going to absolutely implode.  On the other hand if you give me a doubles partner who's positive and a "shake it off" kind of player I'm much more likely to concentrate on the upcoming points and actually put together a solid match.  Heck, just the other night my partner and I won a tight match in a 3rd set tie breaker despite each of us double faulting twice in the tie breaker.  We just laughed and shrugged them off and proceeded to win.

So yes I can be a self-hating loser sometimes, but given the right atmosphere and the right team I tend to overcome my self doubts and actually produce something worth talking about.  As Godin pointed out I'm not alone in having this habit, but I feel like I'm one of the lucky people in the world because I'm surrounded on a daily basis by positive and inspiring people.  That's one of those blessings that's easy to take for granted, but never should be.

 

Good News, Bad News for Tarheel State

According to these graphs the good news is that North Carolina has the most organic Christmas tree farms in America, but the bad news is that North Carolina has the fewest librarians per capita of any state in the 'ol US of A.  

By the way, how do you tell the difference between an organic Christmas tree farm and a non-organic Christmas tree farm?

Not So Desperate Housewives

The latest article from Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi, the preeminent Wall Street basher, is titled The Real Housewives of Wall Street and it's a doozy.  First there's the story of two wives of Wall Street bigwigs who put together a company in 2009 to take advantage of federal bailout funds:

It's hard to imagine a pair of people you would less want to hand a giant welfare check to — yet that's exactly what the Fed did. Just two months before the Macks bought their fancy carriage house in Manhattan, Christy and her pal Susan launched their investment initiative called Waterfall TALF. Neither seems to have any experience whatsoever in finance, beyond Susan's penchant for dabbling in thoroughbred racehorses. But with an upfront investment of $15 million, they quickly received $220 million in cash from the Fed, most of which they used to purchase student loans and commercial mortgages. The loans were set up so that Christy and Susan would keep 100 percent of any gains on the deals, while the Fed and the Treasury (read: the taxpayer) would eat 90 percent of the losses. Given out as part of a bailout program ostensibly designed to help ordinary people by kick-starting consumer lending, the deals were a classic heads-I-win, tails-you-lose investment…

In the case of Waterfall TALF Opportunity, here's what we know: The company was founded in June 2009 with $14.87 million of investment capital, money that likely came from Christy Mack and Susan Karches. The two Wall Street wives then used the $220 million they got from the Fed to buy up a bunch of securities, including a large pool of commercial mortgages managed by Credit Suisse, a company John Mack once headed. Those securities were valued at $253.6 million, though the Fed refuses to explain how it arrived at that estimate. And here's the kicker: Of the $220 million the two wives got from the Fed, roughly $150 million had not been paid back as of last fall — meaning that you and I are still on the hook for most of whatever the Wall Street spouses bought on their government-funded shopping spree.

But this exploration into the adventures of two wives of Wall Street scions leads to bigger questions:

And then there are the bailout deals that make no sense at all. Republicans go mad over spending on health care and school for Mexican illegals. So why aren't they flipping out over the $9.6 billion in loans the Fed made to the Central Bank of Mexico? How do we explain the $2.2 billion in loans that went to the Korea Development Bank, the biggest state bank of South Korea, whose sole purpose is to promote development in South Korea? And at a time when America is borrowing from the Middle East at interest rates of three percent, why did the Fed extend $35 billion in loans to the Arab Banking Corporation of Bahrain at interest rates as low as one quarter of one point?

Even more disturbing, the major stakeholder in the Bahrain bank is none other than the Central Bank of Libya, which owns 59 percent of the operation. In fact, the Bahrain bank just received a special exemption from the U.S. Treasury to prevent its assets from being frozen in accord with economic sanctions. That's right: Muammar Qaddafi received more than 70 loans from the Federal Reserve, along with the Real Housewives of Wall Street.

I'm still waiting for the Feds to launch JERP – Jon's Economic Relief Program.  When they do I'm hitting the beach baby.

Teen Steganography

I found this short article in Wired to be fascinating:

In 440 BC, the Greek historian Herodotus first described a trick that spies used to send hidden messages. They’d write something on the wooden back of a wax tablet, then cover the message with wax bearing its own message. If enemies intercepted the tablet, they wouldn’t suspect it contained anything strange. It’s called steganography: hiding one message inside another.

Two thousand years later, teenagers are doing something similar to communicate with one another—on Facebook…

The solution is what researcher Danah Boyd has dubbed social steganography. Teenagers now post status updates that have two layers: A bland surface meaning intended for parents, and a deeper, richer significance that can be decoded only by close friends.

For example, Boyd interviewed one girl who was going through a breakup while on a class trip and wanted her friends to know but not her mother (who’d “have a heart attack”). So the teenager posted the chorus of a black-humor Monty Python song sung by a group of men who’ve been crucified. (“Always look on the bright side of life / Always look on the bright side of life!”) Her close friends, being fans of the movie, understood the reference and immediately messaged her to offer support. But her mother didn’t know the film, so she thought the lyrics were genuinely cheery and posted a response saying she was glad her daughter was happy.

And all this time I thought my teens just suffered from a severe lack of originality.

Income Inequality

Whether or not you agree with Joseph Stiglitz's take on income inequality in the US, I think you'll find his commentary to be thought provoking:

Alexis de Tocqueville once described what he saw as a chief part of the peculiar genius of American society—something he called “self-interest properly understood.” The last two words were the key. Everyone possesses self-interest in a narrow sense: I want what’s good for me right now! Self-interest “properly understood” is different. It means appreciating that paying attention to everyone else’s self-interest—in other words, the common welfare—is in fact a precondition for one’s own ultimate well-being. Tocqueville was not suggesting that there was anything noble or idealistic about this outlook—in fact, he was suggesting the opposite. It was a mark of American pragmatism. Those canny Americans understood a basic fact: looking out for the other guy isn’t just good for the soul—it’s good for business.

The top 1 percent have the best houses, the best educations, the best doctors, and the best lifestyles, but there is one thing that money doesn’t seem to have bought: an understanding that their fate is bound up with how the other 99 percent live. Throughout history, this is something that the top 1 percent eventually do learn. Too late.

New York City Subway 1986

Something that's normally mundane can become interesting in the proper context.  Video shot in the subway is pretty boring stuff, unless of course the video is 25 years old and provides a snapshot in time.  The video below was shot in the NYC subway system in 1986 and it's fascinating to me because if you didn't know the date of the filming you'd have to look fairly closely to figure out what's different about it.  Sure there are some women wearing dresses with shoulder pads, and some of the shoes have a decidedly old school look to them, but unlike every 80s movie ever made there's not a single pair of parachute pants or Thriller-esque leather jacket to be found.  What you will notice after a while is that not a single person is carrying a phone or other mobile device, which means that people are standing or walking without distraction.  You'll also notice an incredible amount of graffiti on the trains compared to today, and it's a reminder of what it was like before New York adopted the broken windows theory in the 90s.  So yes, this seemingly mundane film is actually a fascinating piece of history.