Category Archives: Personal Finance

One Reason There Will Never Be a Flat Tax

There’s a new study from the Tax Foundation that says that for every dollar in taxes that are collected Americans will spend 22 cents in compliance costs.  From the TaxProf Blog:

The study estimates that complying with the federal income tax code
during 2005 cost U.S. taxpayers $265.1 billion (up from $134.2 billion
in 1995 (in inflation-adjusted dollars)), or 22 cents per dollar of tax
revenues collected (up from 15 cents per dollar of tax revenues
collected in 1995). By 2015, compliance costs are projected to grow to
$482.7 billion.

Compliance
costs are highly regressive, taking a larger toll on low-income
taxpayers as a percentage of income than high-income taxpayers. On the
low end, taxpayers with AG) under $20,000 incur a compliance cost equal
to 5.9% of income while the compliance cost incurred by taxpayers with
AGI over $200,000 amounts to just 0.5% percent of income.

That’s serious money and it’s money going to accountants, lawyers and tax preparation services.  Do you think they’re lobbying for tax reform or simplified taxes?  Hah!  I would LOVE to see a study done on what the economic impact of implementing a flat tax would be.  $265 billion could buy a lot of something besides time with accountants, lawyers and tax preparers but then where would all the lawyers, accountants and tax preparers (and the dollars they spend on their toys) go?

And what about businesses?  What would happen to the capital they would save if all the exemptions went away AND all the costs of accounting went away as well?  Would it be a positive for the economy?

My gut tells me that a simplified or flat tax would be a net positive for the economy, but I can’t see the scumbags, er, leaders of our country letting it happen.

Oh, and as for that argument against a flat tax, you know the one that says it’s unfair to the lower end of the income scale, what does the regressive nature of the compliance costs do to that argument?

You can find the Tax Foundation’s report here.

How Much is Enough?

Via Ed Cone I just read a piece by Dave Winer called Transcendental Money that he wrote five years ago.  This excerpt will give you the gist:

Now I can define my term. Transcendental money is the amount of
money required to transcend time. It makes just enough money to satisfy
all your reasonable needs, wants and desires, but no more. You can do
the math yourself, factor in the cost of living where you live, or want
to live, it’s just arithmetic to determine what your transcendental
money number is.

Once you have your real number, the true nature of money reveals
itself. No matter how much you have, you never feel secure. Sorry, I
didn’t make the rules, have a talk with your god, or your dog, or
whoever you turn to for spiritual guidance. The unhappy ending for all
of us is death, we all lose this game, there’s no winning strategy, and
no matter how much money you attain, you can never feel secure, unless
you trust nothingness, because that’s where we’re all headed.

So money offers a chance, in its absence, to find a happier purpose to
life. I believe that no matter how much money you have it can’t bring
you that secure "I Will Exist Forever" feeling that our hearts all feel
we deserve.

Now, having no money certainly offers a chance to postpone living until
you get the money. I’ve been there, done that, got the prize. But I’ve
seen people with huge piles of money-sweating money who believe that if
they just double their fortune they will feel truly secure. I can’t
help these people, but I can help people who are truly poor.

I read this at an opportune time.  I’m getting ready to head to D.C. to join with some of my fraternity brothers (Iota Xi chapter of Sigma Chi) to help out a brother who’s hit some hard times.  I also know someone going through a divorce and navigating some rough economic waters, literally having a hard time paying the bills and putting food on the table.  So money, or the lack there of, is definitely on my mind.

Part of me feels guilty.  Why, I wonder, am I so caught up in the day-to-day of my own existence, worried about things that are so petty in comparison to the problems that some friends are facing?  I know, I know, it’s human nature, but that knowledge does not alleviate the guilt and quite honestly I don’t think the guilt is misplaced.

Far too much of life is spent in pursuit of more; more money and the supposed security that more money brings.  Mind you I’m not arguing that money is not important. It most definitely is critical to our every day existence just as healthy crops and ample game were critical to our ancestors.  What I’m saying is that even when we have enough money we don’t perceive it as being enough so we spend an inordinate amount of time seeking more. 

Reading Winer’s piece it occured to me that he was on to something.  Money, or at least having it, truly is transcendent.  Most of us have experienced cycles in our life when we have less or more money.  When we are in a down cycle money is our means for survival and when we are in an up cycle it is merely the means through which we get ourselves more stuff, more vacations, etc.  Of course if we don’t control ourselves during the up cycle then we can quickly spend our way into a down cycle, rinse and repeat.

And then there’s the unknown that the future holds.  We’ve all known people who fall on hard times, sometimes by their own hand and sometimes by fate (failing health, natural disaster, etc.).  The uncertainty of the future causes us to feel the need to stockpile money "just in case."  Of course that’s prudent, but only to a point.  Figuring out what that point is, when enough is enough, is critical to being able to take the focus away from day-to-day economic gain and placing it where it belongs, on day-to-day giving.

7 Money Mantras

Boing Boing has a post about Michelle Singletary’s (syndicated personal finance columnist from the Washington Post) personal finance book "7 Money Mantras for a Richer Life."  In the post they list the seven mantras which I’ll just go ahead and list here for you:

Mantra #1: "If it’s on your ass, it’s
not an asset."
Mantra #2: "Is this a need or a want?"
Mantra #3: "Sweat the small stuff."
Mantra #4: "Cash is better than credit."
Mantra
#5: "Keep it simple."
Mantra #6: "Priorities lead to prosperity."
Mantra #7: "Enough is enough."

I particularly like #1.

 

 

Today’s Reads: July 22, 2005

Credit Card Minimum Payments to Double

According to this article several of the largest credit card issuers are getting ready to raise their minimum payments from 2% of the balance to 4% of the balance (not including interest).

The article says that the government has been pushing the credit card companies to raise their minimums to help people get out of debt.  Huh?  What about tightening up credit issuing standards in the first place?  Even better, how about reducing the interest rates so that they don’t qualify as usury any more?

In somewhat related news (article here) some of the same banks’ stocks were hammered by investors yesterday because of disappointing earnings.  These horrible numbers?  Let’s see:

  • Citigroup – Quarterly net income of $5.07 billion
  • Bank of America – Quarterly net income of $4.3 billion, up "only" 12%

Apparently the companies disappointed their investors because they didn’t manage their bond investments well.  On the bright side, here’s what they did well:

"Bank of America
signed up more debit- and credit-card customers and squeezed costs out
of FleetBoston Financial Corp. by combining the banks’ online accounts,
cutting marketing expenses and jobs.

Kenneth Lewis, the
chief executive, is trying to to parlay momentum in credit cards to
increase earnings. Bank of America announced plans last month to buy
MBNA Corp. for $35 billion."

I guess the expected cash flow from those doubled minimums should help quite nicely.

Today’s Reads: July 19, 2005