There’s a new study from the Tax Foundation that says that for every dollar in taxes that are collected Americans will spend 22 cents in compliance costs. From the TaxProf Blog:
The study estimates that complying with the federal income tax code
during 2005 cost U.S. taxpayers $265.1 billion (up from $134.2 billion
in 1995 (in inflation-adjusted dollars)), or 22 cents per dollar of tax
revenues collected (up from 15 cents per dollar of tax revenues
collected in 1995). By 2015, compliance costs are projected to grow to
$482.7 billion.Compliance
costs are highly regressive, taking a larger toll on low-income
taxpayers as a percentage of income than high-income taxpayers. On the
low end, taxpayers with AG) under $20,000 incur a compliance cost equal
to 5.9% of income while the compliance cost incurred by taxpayers with
AGI over $200,000 amounts to just 0.5% percent of income.
That’s serious money and it’s money going to accountants, lawyers and tax preparation services. Do you think they’re lobbying for tax reform or simplified taxes? Hah! I would LOVE to see a study done on what the economic impact of implementing a flat tax would be. $265 billion could buy a lot of something besides time with accountants, lawyers and tax preparers but then where would all the lawyers, accountants and tax preparers (and the dollars they spend on their toys) go?
And what about businesses? What would happen to the capital they would save if all the exemptions went away AND all the costs of accounting went away as well? Would it be a positive for the economy?
My gut tells me that a simplified or flat tax would be a net positive for the economy, but I can’t see the scumbags, er, leaders of our country letting it happen.
Oh, and as for that argument against a flat tax, you know the one that says it’s unfair to the lower end of the income scale, what does the regressive nature of the compliance costs do to that argument?
You can find the Tax Foundation’s report here.