Category Archives: Business – Opinion

Good Business at Greensboro’s Bistro Sofia

============================================
Now you can get a business degree right from the comfort of home thanks to the online business degree programs that are offered by many business administration centers of colleges and universities worldwide. As more people get business administration degrees through the Internet having an online business degree is becoming more reputable.
============================================

In April I wrote a blog called Bad Business at Greensboro’s Bistro Sofia, and it referenced a blog post by a woman named Sarah Jones in Greensboro who had a negative experience at Bistro Sofia which included some alleged anti-semitic comments by a waiter and a bunch of other stuff.  My main point in writing the post was that it was amazing how the woman’s story spread thanks to her blog and the fact that it was noticed by a prominent blogger named Ed Cone and then picked up by at least one other blogger in another town in the region (that would be me).  I also pointed out that since Google loves blogs my post might get a high ranking for the search term "Bistro Sofia." Sure enough a month later that post now comes up third with that keyword.  Which is why I eventually came to the attention of Kerrie Thomas, the restaurant’s general manager.  He left a comment on the post and that started a very good email correspondence between us.

Long story short I was not at the restaurant and I don’t know which version of the story is most accurate, but I wanted to say that Kerrie has made a very smart business move by addressing the issue (not wishing it away) and his correspondence with me has been very professional and, I think, forthright.  Kerrie wrote a letter to me explaining their stance on this issue and I am posting it below with his permission.  I think it offers a good lesson in modern PR for any small business.

I’d also like to say I’ve learned a valuable lesson myself.  Sometimes I feel that I’m writing this only for my own entertainment and for an audience of a few friends and family.  The truth is that I never know who’s reading and I have to be careful how I write.  After the correspondence with Kerrie I realized that I neglected to say that the events described were alleged to have happened.  Ed Cone, who is a professional journalist, didn’t make that mistake and I consider it a valuable lesson learned.

So without further ado here’s Kerrie’s letter.  I think it’s worth the read:

To Mr. Jon Lowder:

From Kerrie Thomas

As
briefly as possible I’d like too address the issues raised in the
blog you reference on your sight.  I feel it is critical to note
that the story we know is in stark contrast to the one we read.

First,
the remark made to the couple by their server (and it is our contention
that the exact words of the exchange were quite different than what
has been asserted) was, regardless, poorly chosen and unfortunate. Their
server, even as he recounted the details of their evening, was unaware
that he had in any way offended them and most certainly hadn’t intended
to come across in such a way as to do so.

It
is also important to note that when the remark was brought to my attention
by Mrs. Jones that evening (when she called in reference to the charge
amount) and I asked her what he said that might have been “off color”,
she said that it was a conversation for another day. I immediately apologized
for whatever it might have been and promised to speak to their server,
Joshua, about it at the end of the evening. I also asked if we had taken
care of her otherwise, to which she responded that the food was wonderful
and everyone was really great (or something to that effect).

When
Mrs. Jones emailed the owner, Beth Kizhnerman, the following morning
and we were apprised of what she thought Joshua had said, along with
several pages detailing her entire experience from the moment she walked
in, Beth responded with a written apology. She assured her it was a
misunderstanding, Joshua was truly sorry and that he felt awful about
it.

Second
is the issue regarding the charge amount. When processing the Jones’s
card, Joshua hastily and unwittingly added an extra digit to the amount.
When it was brought to his attention, he apologized, immediately adjusted
the transaction to the correct amount.  Then, he informed the Jones’s
that if they view their account online, the original “charge” will
show up as an authorization amount but will disappear after a couple
of days. Also, if the hold on the account might cause any problems (the
bank will treat that electronic contact from our processor as a hold
regardless of it being adjusted on our end) she should call them, the
bank will then call us and it will be eliminated. It was obviously an
honest mistake and he instructed them on how to properly take care of
it were it to become a problem.

When
Mrs. Jones called soon after their departure that same evening, I was
as yet unaware of anything going awry at her table and thought we had
a good rapport through the evening. She said that they enjoyed their
meal but didn’t think it was worth the $1200.00 that she was viewing
online in her account. Well, of course not. I assured her that we certainly
would not process her card for that amount and it would be taken care
of (not knowing it had already been adjusted). She said it was a debit
card and would cause all sorts of problems. Therefore, I said she would
have to call the bank to have it cleared from her account (because it
isn’t possible for me to discuss her account with the bank). I also
said, reassuring her, that if in fact she had any problems, incurred
any charges or fees whatsoever; we would completely take care of them.
(Conveniently absent from her story). I’m also sure that I apologized
for the error. A few minutes later the bank called to confirm the error
and the authorization amount was cleared.

I
did follow up with Joshua at the end of the shift and asked him to recount
exactly everything he said to the table. It was not in a threatening
way and he had no reason to not speak truthfully to me, especially since
he had no idea what “off color” remark he might have said. 
In the recounting, yes, I realized what she would have been taken aback
by regarding their exchange and I let him know then that it could easily
have been misconstrued. It was careless and he needed to apologize. 
I told him that when we invite them back in, he would be taking care
of them and buying them dinner. To which he said, of course, he would
be glad to.

I
made a note to call her back the next day to follow up on what she had
said about an “off-color” remark. That call, of course, was preempted
by the lengthy morning email Mrs. Jones sent to Beth.
   

The
incongruity of the story is so striking because her version is hyperbolic.
A wonderful experience/a horrible experience.  Characterizations
of our attitudes or about any pretension are just nonsense. Yes, errors
were made by us, they were apologized for multiple times and they were
fixed. Beth apologized to Mrs. Jones in response to her email because
Mrs. Jones sent the email to her personally. There is no higher authority
to apologize to her than the owner. Mrs. Jones at that time seemed satisfied
with the response from Beth and if she wasn’t, she most certainly
could have told us otherwise.

Beth
and I have both since emailed Mrs. Jones personally regarding her disseminating
the story. She has yet to respond, save to say on her blog that she
received a couple of “ugly emails” from Bistro Sofia.  That
is neither a fair nor accurate characterization of them but, once again,
good storytelling. We noted in the posts to Mrs. Jones’s blog many
hateful, inflammatory remarks about our restaurant by people who don’t
even know us and similarly disparaging remarks in subsequent broadcast
emails by folks referencing the blog. An alarming bit of brouhaha over
a single dining experience, especially considering the unadorned story
and the many apologies made to Mrs. Jones. We are nothing like the picture
she paints; it’s a shame that she doesn’t recognize it.

Since
you were referencing it in your blog we thought you should know this.

We’re
an independent, hard working, conscientious, honest, caring group of
people (and anyone familiar with the restaurant is well aware of it).
And, ironically, the restaurant is Jewish owned. We can’t speculate
on Mrs. Jones’s motivation but we hope she will reconsider keeping
that entry on her blog.

Please let me know if you have any
questions.

Thank you for allowing me to write
you.

Kind regards,

Kerrie Thomas

General Manager

Bistro Sofia

Postscript: 
It might be important to note that Mrs. Jones says that while checking
her account later she thought we didn’t charge her at all and then
a couple of days later we did. In fact, nothing else was done regarding
the charge after my conversation with her and the bank the night she
was in.  It was normal bank processing after that.

Profit vs. Non-Profit

David Boyd has this from Walter Williams:

One of the wonderful things about free markets is that the path to
greater wealth comes not from looting, plundering and enslaving one’s
fellow man, as it has throughout most of human history, but by serving
and pleasing him. Many of the wonderful achievements of the 20th
century were the result of the pursuit of profits. Unfortunately,
demagoguery has led to profits becoming a dirty word. Nonprofit is seen
as more righteous, particularly when people pompously stand before us
and declare, “We’re a nonprofit organization.”




Profit is cast in a poor light because people don’t understand the role
of profits. Profit is a payment to entrepreneurs just as wages are
payments to labor, interest to capital and rent to land. In order to
earn profits in free markets, entrepreneurs must identify and satisfy
human wants in a way that economizes on society’s scarce resources.


As you may know I do most of my work with non-profits and here is what I can tell you about them: the good ones behave just like well-run, for-profit companies.  If they think of themselves as existing for a “higher purpose” and justify their existence in that light then they are doomed.  If, on the other hand, they view their members or constituents as customers and view their existence as serving those customers then they are most likely going to succeed.

About Disney

Stephen Levitt of Freakonomics fame recently posted about his family’s experience at Disney.  He makes some valid points about the “Disney experience” i.e. you end up spending a lot of time standing in line and it’s expensive.  As I posted before we just did the Disney thing last week and although we didn’t experience many long lines, the benefit of visiting at a non-peak time of year and early in the week, I can definitely vouch that it IS expensive.

Levitt also asks two questions:

1) Why is demand for Disneyworld so great?

2) Why do they make you stick your fingers into some machine when entering Disneyworld? What is the point?

My take is that although Disneyworld is expensive and puts you through a lot of waiting they do the basics well:  the place is much cleaner than your average theme park, the staff tends to be more pleasant than at your average theme park, the food is definitely better than at other theme parks and they offer more than roller coasters and spinning rides with their “multimedia” experiences.  They also have an inherent marketing advantage with their cartoons, movies, networks, etc.

Yet with all that I don’t think we’ll go back until it’s time for the grandkids.  There really isn’t a lot of stuff for the kids once they get into the teen years (my oldest two definitely found the shows to be a little cheesey on this trip and they’re just 12 and 13) and as an adult I have to say you tend to suffer through the experience for the sake of the kids.

As for the finger thing I found out the hard way that they use the finger scanner to tie you to a specific access card.  I don’t know if they use fingerprints or some other biometric but I know it definitely works since I mixed up my daughter’s card with mine and they had to re-code my card to let me in.

The paranoid part of my brain also thinks maybe the Bush administration has something to do with it…nah.

Can’t Accuse the Greensboro News & Record of Being Passive

The Greensboro News & Record is getting more recognition for its forward-thinking in terms of new media.  PressThink, which has been a fan of the N&R for a while, recently profiled the paper’s editor John Robinson (although being compared to Mr. Rogers is definitely a mixed blessing).  This is well-earned attention because the N&R is doing what any business in a threatened industry should do: get aggressive.

It started with their blogging, which JR should take credit for because he led the way.  He could have assigned blogging to someone else but he stepped into the fray himself and that sent an important message to the people working for and with him.  He is also careful to share the credit if not shift it completely, to the very smart people he has working with him like Lex Alexander.  That’s another sign of leadership and he should get credit for it.  He’s right, of course, that they all deserve credit but if you’re going to get the criticism that leaders always get then you should also get credit when it is due.

This would be an interesting story if the folks at the N&R stopped with the blogging, but they didn’t. They have now launched three community hubs, called "Hometown Hubs", is experimenting with podcasts and is also delving into using multimedia for stories.  All of these initiatives can be found in their Town Square section. They have also restructured their classified advertising, which is the lifeblood for any newspaper.

The N&R is absolutely doing the right thing.  Its traditional business is under assault and the relative cost of experimenting online now is very low compared with the risk of doing nothing or moving slowly.  If nothing else it is raising the cost of entering the market higher for any potential entrepreneurial competitors, but more importantly it is allowing its people to learn the skills they need in the coming decade or two while the cost of doing so is small.  That is truly forward thinking.

I Wonder if SunTrust Would Care if They Knew

A Greensboro-based blogger named Jay Ovittore wrote a post about the policy at SunTrust Bank to immediately debit a transaction yet hold a refund for several days.  The policy came to his attention when a store clerk mistakenly overcharged a transaction and then immediately refunded it.  Since the refund didn’t kick in right away several other transactions caused him to overdraw his account and rack up over $200 in overdraft fees.

What’s interesting to me is that Jay got 10 comments on his post, and all of them were recommendations for other banks and credit unions.  SunTrust did eventually make things right and it’s not like they’re the only bank with this policy, but they now have their competitors being promoted at their expense on a blog post that will eventually pick up search engine traffic, and at least locally it has stirred up a little noise.  (It’s the network effect in action).  SunTrust is a big institution, so my question is do they know about this and if they do know about it do they care?  Somehow I doubt it, because if they did they would have a representative posting a comment in their own defense.

Should SunTrust care?  Sure they should, because even in the offline world one disgruntled customer typically tells their friends and colleagues when they get bad service and they also tell those friends and colleagues when a company does something extraordinary to make up for it. Conversely, customers rarely tell anyone when they get adequate or even good service which generally makes them a silent majority. Right now SunTrust has a disgruntled soon-to-be-ex-customer that offers them an opportunity to get out a positive message about their company and they’re missing it.

Flying the Unfriendly Skies

Yesterday I had a 1:45 flight from Greensboro to Washington-Dulles on United.  The plane took off on time, but halfway to DC we were turned around and did an emergency landing back at Greensboro due to a faulty sensor in the cabin door. Bummer.

Back on the ground we were told to de-plane and then wait for word about the flight.  Eventually it was cancelled (about 5:00) and in the interim United’s computers went down worldwide.  That meant that no one could tell us if we’d be able to get on the next flight because they couldn’t pull up the reservation system and they couldn’t tell if the flight was full (it was).  And they couldn’t tell me if I’d have a seat this morning if I came back to the airport so I ended up renting a car and driving up.  My little one hour flight turned into a 12 hour ordeal.

Most bothersome to me was:

  • They only had one person working two gates and handling all the flights.  This poor woman (her name was Alicia) did yeoman work and never lost her cool, and she was lucky that there weren’t any really nasty passengers to deal with. Why did they leave her stranded there like that for over five or six hours?  Where was her backup, especially when she had two or three flights at a time to deal with?
  • Communication from United was terrible and almost non-existent.  The woman at the gate was using her personal cell phone to call other agents at other airports she had worked with on previous assignments to try and find out what was going on.  She might as well have been stranded on an island with the amount of communication she received from the company, and consequently we were on the same island with her.
  • How can United not have some kind of backup system for this contingency?
  • No love from United.  Last year when I had a flight out of Dulles that was delayed several hours on the soon-to-be defunct Independence Airline they brought in extra staff to deal with the passengers and they provided us with complimentary sodas and chips.  Yesterday, despite being there for over six hours no one from United even offered a drink or food voucher. Heck, no manager even came down to the gate to check things out.

I want to emphasize that the employees at United that I dealt with were all polite and as helpful as they could be. Their management hung them out to dry, and if anyone from United is reading this I can tell you that your folks were great and they never once pointed the finger at you even though they should have.

Friendly skies my butt.

Thinking About Corporate Welfare, er, Incentives and Subsidies

This has been the "Year of Dell" here in Forsyth County, North Carolina.  The state of North Carolina gave Dell hundreds of millions of dollars worth of incentives to build their newest plant in the state and then Forsyth County/Winston-Salem chipped in tens of millions of their own to attract the company to our fair confines.  Obviously this caused much debate within the community, and although my gut tells me that these corporate incentives stink in principle my head also tells me that if that is the playing field we’re on then we must compete aggressively.

Personally I think the jury is out on whether the deal is good for the county/city/state.  I honestly think that Dell will come through with the jobs they promised, but if the deal was made simply on the merits of Dell’s direct employment numbers then the folks who made the deal on behalf of the governments are fools.  They aren’t fools; they’re counting on the Dell deal to attract other companies as suppliers (that is happening) and even more importantly they are sending a signal to other tech companies that this is a great region to open for business.  I hope they’re right; I hope that Dell leads to more tech companies moving here to replace the emaciated textile, furniture and tobacco industries.  We’ll have to wait and see.

My biggest worry, though, is that if something doesn’t change this will be just the beginning of a corporate welfare trend that can be quite harmful in the long-term.  Our neighbors to the west in Tennessee are already seeing an increase in companies looking for incentive deals similar to one it gave Nissan to move it’s headquarters there from California, and I’m sure NC is getting similar inquiries now as well.  Let’s not beat around the bush here; what the states are doing is bribing companies to open shop there.  They aren’t saying "Look at our great business environment with an educated workforce, a safe place for your employees to live and a progressive tax structure."  They’re saying "Look at our great business environment and the $200 million we’ll hand you to move here."  That’s bribery and you or I would be put in jail if we did the same thing.

Unfortunately all the state economic development folks think they have to do this in order to compete.  But do they really?  Dr. Jeffrey Cornwall of The Entrepreneurial Mind has this to say:

Since most of our economic growth and new job creation are a result of
entrepreneurial development, spending so much trying to attract
corporations to move their operations may be misguided. If there are
enough slack resources in state funding to offer rich incentive
packages, let’s cut tax rates instead and let the market generate jobs
and growth, as lower taxes and less government spur entrepreneurial
activity.

I agree with him.  What if NC and Winston-Salem/Forsyth County had used that same $200+ million dollars in incentives to create incentives for local entrepreneurs to build businesses based on the skills and infrastructure being left behind by the collapsing textile and furniture industries?  Yes those industries are getting their asses handed to them by the Chinese, but there are some smart people out there who can figure out a way to create new market niches that our own people can fill.

That leads me to an article I read in Business 2.0 the other day about the US cotton industry, which is the recipient of lots of subsidies from the Federal government.  Let’s just say that the system makes it hard for the US to claim a free-market environment with a straight face.  And even worse, since some of the subsidies are paid to foreign-owned multi-national companies some of these subsidies benefit other countries. 

The cotton people make the claims you always hear in stories like this: without the subsidies the average farmer will go under, whole farming communities will be devastated, etc.  Of course most of the subsidies go to large corporate operations as there aren’t many family farmers left, and it ignores the fact that the subsidies artificially suppress cotton prices.  That means that most cotton sells below cost, which on the surface means that without subsidies the industry would crash.  But without the subsidies prices would go up and growers could actually make an honest profit on their operations.

In fact some farmers are already planning for the end of subsidies by growing specialized cotton that sells at high prices and is in great demand due to it’s limited quantity.  That’s true free-market innovation.

So what’s my point?  My point is that by using incentives and subsidies we are engaging in corporate welfare.  We are incentivizing our businesses negatively and we’re instilling in them the habit of looking for a handout.  And we have to remember that prices always go up, so it’s only going to get more expensive to bribe these companies in the future.

And what about the hard-working entrepreneurs who get no handouts?  What message are we sending them?  Do you think that they feel the same level of resentment that the average hard-working individual feels when they hear about folks who abuse the welfare system?  Do you think they feel that the Dells and Nissans of the world are a 21st century version of carpetbaggers?  Wouldn’t you?

To my way of thinking these incentives and subsidies are literally un-American.  We need to get back to competing on true merit. Yes, I understand that other countries tilt the playing field in certain ways (dumping, unfair tariffs, etc.) but until we clean our own house we don’t really have a leg to stand on when we ask them to do the same.  I say we clean up our own act and then act quickly and aggressively to make sure others do the same.

Interesting Customer Service

TThis blog is created on and hosted by a service called Typepad, which is provided by a company called Six Apart. Over the past month or so the service has had some serious problems, particularly for some of the more popular bloggers that use it like MicroPersuasion.  It hasn’t been as much of a problem for me because, well, about four people read this thing.

Bloggers being bloggers the Typepad customers have not suffered in silence.  They’ve posted quite a bit about their problems with the service and Six Apart has done a good job of responding to their complaints.  I figured Six Apart would work out their problems (mostly upgrading their hardware and software) and then the service would improve and that would be that.

That was until I received this email today from the CEO of Six Apart:

Dear Jon,
 

Two weeks ago I wrote you to explain the problems that some of our users experienced last month and what we were doing
to fix them.  Today I want to tell you about the work we’ve done and our plans to compensate you for the inconvenience
and frustration we may have caused you.<!–
D(["mb","

\r\n\r\n

The progress we\’ve made

\r\n\r\n

\r\nOver the last two weeks we have made great strides. As we recently posted on Mena\’s Corner, we have made a number of significant technical changes. \r\n\r\nWe have upgraded hardware throughout the service, we are about to finish installation of a new enterprise-grade data \r\n\r\nstorage device and the move to our new data center is nearly complete. All of this has led to improved performance.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nWe are not yet perfect. One incident on Tuesday November 8th between approximately 9:00 am and noon Pacific Time caused \r\n\r\nlimited access to the TypePad application. Even with that problem the performance of TypePad, as reported by our \r\n\r\ncustomers, our internal systems and the independent Keynote monitoring service, has improved greatly over the last 12 \r\n\r\ndays.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nWhile we are not done with our work, and there is always the chance of outages on any web service, we believe that the \r\n\r\nworst performance is behind us, and it is now time to focus on how we can make these problems up to you.

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Compensation for this less than stellar performance

\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\nWe are all aware that you pay for TypePad and expect to receive superior service and performance in return. At times \r\n\r\nlast month, we did not provide that type of experience to all our customers and apologies are not good enough.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nWe also know that some customers have been more heavily impacted than others. If you often use the service on weekdays \r\n\r\nbetween 7:00 am and 1:00 pm Pacific Time you may have experienced one or even many periods when you had problems with \r\n\r\nTypePad\’s speed and responsiveness. If you use the service at other times, you may not have experienced any problems at \r\n\r\nall. After wrestling with these facts and wanting to be fair to all our users we have decided that the only option is \r\n\r\nto “,1]
);
//–>

The progress we’ve made

Over the last two weeks we have made great strides. As we recently posted on Mena’s Corner, we have made a number of significant technical changes. 
We have upgraded hardware throughout the service, we are about to finish installation of a new enterprise-grade data
storage device and the move to our new data center is nearly complete.  All of this has led to improved performance.

We are not yet perfect.  One incident on Tuesday November 8th between approximately 9:00 am and noon Pacific Time caused
limited access to the TypePad application.  Even with that problem the performance of TypePad, as reported by our
customers, our internal systems and the independent Keynote monitoring service, has improved greatly over the last 12
days.

While we are not done with our work, and there is always the chance of outages on any web service, we believe that the
worst performance is behind us, and it is now time to focus on how we can make these problems up to you.

Compensation for this less than stellar performance

We are all aware that you pay for TypePad and expect to receive superior service and performance in return. At times
last month, we did not provide that type of experience to all our customers and apologies are not good enough.

We also know that some customers have been more heavily impacted than others.  If you often use the service on weekdays
between 7:00 am and 1:00 pm Pacific Time you may have experienced one or even many periods when you had problems with
TypePad’s speed and responsiveness.  If you use the service at other times, you may not have experienced any problems at
all.  After wrestling with these facts and wanting to be fair to all our users we have decided that the only option is
to <!–
D(["mb","allow you to choose how Six Apart should compensate you.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nBy default, you will receive a credit for 15 free days of TypePad service. To get this credit you don\’t have to \r\n\r\ndo anything; we will just credit your account.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nThat said, we recognize that customers have had different experiences with the service, so we want to give you the \r\n\r\nopportunity to choose more, or even less compensation. If you click the link below, you\’ll get a screen that offers you \r\n\r\nthe following choices:

\r\n\r\n\r\n

    \r\n\r\n

  • \r\nWhile the performance issues caused me some inconvenience I mainly found the service acceptable last month.
    \r\nGive me 15 free days of TypePad. \r\n

  • \r\n\r\n

  • \r\nThe performance issues made it very difficult for me to use the service on multiple occasions during the month.
    \r\nGive me 30 free days of TypePad.\r\n

  • \r\n\r\n

  • \r\nThe performance issues affected me greatly, making my experience unacceptable for most of the month.
    \r\nGive me 45 free days of TypePad.\r\n

  • \r\n\r\n\r\n

  • \r\nI really wasn\’t affected and feel I got the great service I paid for last month.
    \r\nThank you for the offer, but please don\’t credit my account.\r\n

  • \r\n\r\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\n

Make your choice now.

\r\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\nIf you want to elect for more or less compensation you have until Sunday, November 27th to go to the web address \r\n\r\nabove. By Monday December 5th we will apply either 15 free days or your stated compensation preference to your \r\n\r\naccount. If you are billed monthly, you will notice a gap in charges to your credit card for the number of days you \r\n\r\nselect. If you are billed annually, we will extend your billing cycle by the number of days you select.

\r\n\r\n\r\n

The future

\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\nI must say that one of the most rewarding aspects of these last three frustrating weeks have been the emails I have \r\n\r\nreceived from many of you. A large number of the messages I received were very kind and supportive, and some of you \r\n\r\nwere understandably angry, but you all expressed that you just wanted the service you loved back. Rest assured that we \r\n\r\nare working night and day to do just that and more. “,1]
);
//–>allow you to choose how Six Apart should compensate you.

By default, you will receive a credit for 15 free days of TypePad service. To get this credit you don’t have to
do anything; we will just credit your account.

That said, we recognize that customers have had different experiences with the service, so we want to give you the
opportunity to choose more, or even less compensation.  If you click the link below, you’ll get a screen that offers you
the following choices:

  • While the performance issues caused me some inconvenience I mainly found the service acceptable last month.
    Give me 15 free days of TypePad.

  • The performance issues made it very difficult for me to use the service on multiple occasions during the month.
    Give me 30 free days of TypePad.

  • The performance issues affected me greatly, making my experience unacceptable for most of the month.
    Give me 45 free days of TypePad.

  • I really wasn’t affected and feel I got the great service I paid for last month.
    Thank you for the offer, but please don’t credit my account.

 

 Make Your Choice Now.

If you want to elect for more or less compensation you have until Sunday, November 27th to go to the web address
above.  By Monday December 5th we will apply either 15 free days or your stated compensation preference to your
account.  If you are billed monthly, you will notice a gap in charges to your credit card for the number of days you
select.  If you are billed annually, we will extend your billing cycle by the number of days you select.

The future

I must say that one of the most rewarding aspects of these last three frustrating weeks have been the emails I have
received from many of you.  A large number of the messages I received were very kind and supportive, and some of you
were understandably angry, but you all expressed that you just wanted the service you loved back.  Rest assured that we
are working night and day to do just that and more.  <!–
D(["mb","

\r\n\r\n

\r\nWe are committed to making the service faster and more reliable than it has ever been. With our new data center we now \r\n\r\nhave room to add the capacity we will need to continue our growth while improving performance and adding often requested \r\n\r\nfeatures.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nWe will soon roll out a new release of TypePad that will include more controls for comment and TrackBack spam as well \r\n\r\nmore performance improvements. By year end we will do even more to improve TypePad and add the features you have asked \r\n\r\nfor. We are excited to get back to building a great product for you.

\r\n\r\n

\r\nThank you for your patience over the past several weeks and I hope you accept our sincere apologies for the \r\n\r\ninconvenience we may have caused you.

\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\nSincerely,

\r\n\r\n

\r\nBarak Berkowitz
\r\nChairman and CEO
\r\nSix Apart, Ltd.
\r\nbarakb@sixapart.com\r\n

\r\n\r\n

\r\nThe makers of of TypePad, LiveJournal and Movable Type.

\r\n\r\n

\r\n

\r\n\r\n

\r\nPS: As always, we appreciate and value your feedback. Feel free to reply to this message, file a support ticket in TypePad, or email me at \r\n\r\nBarakB@sixapart.com. We will continue to update status.sixapart.com to keep \r\n\r\ninformed of the status of the service and to provide advance notice of scheduled maintenance.

\r\n\r\n

\r\n

\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\n

\r\n

\r\n

\r\n

\r\n

\r\n

“,1]
);
//–>

We are committed to making the service faster and more reliable than it has ever been.  With our new data center we now
have room to add the capacity we will need to continue our growth while improving performance and adding often requested
features.

We will soon roll out a new release of TypePad that will include more controls for comment and TrackBack spam as well
more performance improvements.  By year end we will do even more to improve TypePad and add the features you have asked
for.  We are excited to get back to building a great product for you.

Thank you for your patience over the past several weeks and I hope you accept our sincere apologies for the
inconvenience we may have caused you. 

Sincerely,

Barak Berkowitz
Chairman and CEO
Six Apart, Ltd.
barakb@sixapart.com

I don’t know that I’ve ever received a customer service message quite like it.  Basically they’re saying that they know their service has been sub-par, they regret it and they also understand that some people have been affected more than others.  Then they put it in the customers’ hands to decide how much they’ve been impacted and how much compensation they will take.  Essentially it’s customer service with an honor code.

Well my vote is that it’s genius.  Not only is it a good faith gesture to their customers it’s also a weird kind of customer survey.  They’ll be able to gauge their customers’ satisfaction by how they react to the offer.  It really is smart and it also feels genuine.

I’m impressed.

 

Are Do-Gooder Suits Really Doing Good?

John Mackey, the CEO of Whole Foods has a blog and on it there’s a re-print from Reason magazine of a debate he had with Milton Friedman (famous and influential economist) and TJ Rodgers (CEO of Cypress Semiconductors) about the concept of corporate philanthropy.  You can read the whole thing here.

Here’s a couple of the intro paragraphs:

Thirty-five years ago, Milton Friedman wrote a famous article for The New York Times Magazine
whose title aptly summed up its main point: "The Social Responsibility
of Business Is to Increase Its Profits." The future Nobel laureate in
economics had no patience for capitalists who claimed that "business is
not concerned ‘merely’ with profit but also with promoting desirable
‘social’ ends; that business has a ‘social conscience’ and takes
seriously its responsibilities for providing employment, eliminating
discrimination, avoiding pollution and whatever else may be the
catchwords of the contemporary crop of reformers."…

John Mackey, the founder and CEO of Whole Foods, is one businessman
who disagrees with Friedman. A self-described ardent libertarian whose
conversation is peppered with references to Ludwig von Mises and
Abraham Maslow, Austrian economics and astrology, Mackey believes
Friedman’s view is too narrow a description of his and many other
businesses’ activities. As important, he argues that Friedman’s take
woefully undersells the humanitarian dimension of capitalism.

In the debate that follows, Mackey lays out his personal
vision of the social responsibility of business. Friedman responds, as
does T.J. Rodgers, the founder and CEO of Cypress Semiconductor and the
chief spokesman of what might be called the tough love school of
laissez faire. Dubbed "one of America’s toughest bosses" by Fortune,
Rodgers argues that corporations add far more to society by maximizing
"long-term shareholder value" than they do by donating time and money
to charity.

If you don’t already you should also read/subscribe to Reason, the original source of the debate.  It consistently runs some great stuff.

Reading List October 10, 2005