Reynolds Gets Front Page Treatment on the Other WSJ

The Wall Street Journal gives front page treatment to Reynolds' moves in the smokeless tobacco market. Here's a lead paragraph that'll grab you:

During board meetings, Reynolds American Inc. Chief Executive Susan Ivey likes to suck on dissolvable smokeless-tobacco strips to get her nicotine fix.

That visual just doesn't conjure up the same, well, sophisticated image as the execs on Mad Men sucking on Camels, which I'm thinking is going to be a marketing challenge for Ivey and her cohorts. I mean if we're going to be honest with ourselves we have to admit that smoking looks a lot cooler than sucking on something, even if it does make you smell like a wet goat.


Discover more from Befuddled

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Reynolds Gets Front Page Treatment on the Other WSJ

  1. Yarddawg's avatarYarddawg

    RAI is also into smoking cessation with the recent purchase of Swedish based Niconovum. The new RAI is “a total tobacco company” not just a cigarette maker. Yes it is a marketing challenge and yes cigarettes are also an even greater marketing challenge in today’s world.
    If you are sucking on a “dissolvable” stick or snus in a restaurant you are not delivering secondhand smoke to your neighbor. In fact the last time we all had coffee at Simplyyummy I was using Camel Snus the whole and no one had a clue.

    Reply
  2. Unknown's avatarJon Lowder

    Hey YD,
    Yep, I know a few people are into Snus and I agree that theyre
    definitely preferable to cigs. The article mentions all the points you
    made too, but I just got a kick out of that opening paragraph and the
    image it conjured. It made it sound like she was working that stuff
    like a lollipop in the boardroom which is why I thought of the
    contrast with the image of execs in the early 60s smoking away in
    the boardroom. Different world.
    Jon

    Reply
  3. Jim Caserta's avatarJim Caserta

    The image had to be different than if she had been either chewing or dipping – I’m guessing it’s both smokeless and spitless? While chew or dip might not produce 2nd hand smoke, but the spitting isn’t the most neighborly.

    Reply

Leave a reply to Jon Lowder Cancel reply