Solitaire, Minesweeper and Your Taxes

Here’s a stat from an article in the Christian Science Monitor about our friends at the IRS:

But research done by the IRS has shown that over 50
percent of the time an IRS employee goes on a computer, he or she also
hooks up to the Internet to shop, gamble or play games.

The article was about a piece of legislation in North Carolina that would require the state to remove solitaire and other games from all 50,000 state computers.  What would you expect from the largest state that does NOT have a lottery?

Fark Headline of the Day

Courtesy of Fark.com: "Massive rallies sweep across Kyrgyzstan over election fraud, vowel shortage"

It was originally "In order to shake label of ‘Fat City USA,’ Houston organizes a bike ride with free beer and tacos," until this one came along.  I also considered "North Carolina considering banning ‘Solitaire’ on state-owned machines" just because I live in NC and I’m beginning to wonder about our elected officials and our state employees.

Congress and the Roid Boys

Anybody watch the congressional testimony of the roidboys, I mean "baseball-players-who-couldn’t-hold-Hank-Aaron’s-Jock"? 

How funny is it that we have congressmen, those paragons of propriety, calling baseball players on the carpet for setting a bad example to America’s yutes?  How bizarre is this country we call the US of A?

The committee that is putting on this fiasco is the "House Government Reform Committee."  Huh? What does this have to do with government reform?

So I decide to check out this House Government Reform Committee.  A quick Google search and I’m on their website.  I look at their oversight plan, and I find that this is one ambitious group of legislators.

Here’s a partial list of what they are supposed to oversee:  Homeland Security, National Guard, US Postal Service, Management Reform, Diploma Mills (huh?), Electronic Voting, Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Unfunded Mandate Reform Act, New Dietary Guidelines (huh?), US Visitor & Immigrant Status Indicator Technology, Transportation Security Administration, Oversight of District of Columbia (great job guys!), 21st Century Healthcare yada, yada, yada.

Okay let’s state the obvious: these guys are 1. jock sniffers and 2. looking for a little network camera time.  I know that major league baseball as well as the other major sports leagues in the U.S. enjoy a special business status (I’m of the opinion that should end), but there’s no need for congress to be involved.

Steroids are illegal.  Let law enforcement take care of it.  Put a few players and their suppliers behind bars and you’ll start to see some action.

As for congress, start working on real problems like 21st century healthcare, medicare, homeland security and real government reform.

Consider the source, not the source’s source

Fred Wilson, a New York based venture capitalist who writes the A VC blog, has an interesting post about the policy of his daughter’s school to require some offline citations in the bibliographies of student papers.  This struck he and his wife as somewhat "antiquated."

His wife wrote a note about the "antiquated" policy to the school’s principal and he replied saying (paraphrasing the post’s paraphrase here) that the school’s policy was intentional because the internet was instant gratification.  By requiring student’s to use offline sources they felt there would be more thought and consideration given to the work.

I disagree.  Just because you can get sources faster online, or more slowly offline, doesn’t cause you to be more or less deliberate in your thinking.  That comes from the experience of having your conclusions evaluated and torn apart by others. (Fred addresses this in his post).

Schools shouldn’t concentrate on whether sources are online or offline. They should concentrate on teaching their students how to identify and evaluate legitimate sources, how to apply their own critical thinking to those sources and how to avoid the growing tendency to ignore sources that disagree or disprove their preconceived notions.

After all the National Enquirer could be considered an offline source.

Fark Headline of the Day

I’m a devoted fan of Fark.com, much to the chagrine of people like my mom.  Honestly my favorite part of the site is the headlines they come up with, so I’ve decided to add a new category to this site called "Fark Headline." 

This is my way of paying homage to the sophomoric view of life, which I suspect many 38 year old men share.  Here’s my favorite headline today:

Embattled polygamous police chief says religion
doesn’t rule his job, but admits in domestic disturbance calls, often
finds himself asking, "Would the four of you quiet down?"

What would Granny make of modern media?

In his blog Jeff Jarvis blasts Sen. Ted Stevens about the Senator’s desire to regulate cable TV the same way that broadcast television is regulated.  He then points out that the Senator lumped VOIP into the discussion and rightly argues that the "V" in VOIP stands for voice, which means the Senator is proposing to regulate phone service too.

In making his argument Jarvis writes, "But in all honesty, it’s hard to tell whether he’s targeting the
internet… or whether he’s just an ignorant, confused, old fool."  Harsh.

That got me to thinking, though, about how often I have to explain the new media landscape to relatives and friends, both yound and old.  All of them are very smart, none of them are addled, and I guarantee you that very few of them could tell you what "VOIP", "Blog", of "Wiki" means.

New media is indeed confusing and complex. 

Then I thought, "What would my grandparents make of all this?"  My paternal grandmother is still alive, but my maternal grandparents both passed away in the ’80s.  They would be blown away by all this.

Think about it.  They were born in 1909 and 1913 respectively.  In their lifetimes they experienced the birth and mainstreaming of the radio, telephone, television and even cable.  (Not to mention, automobiles, commercial aircraft and man walking on the moon).

Yet with all of that change they still had time to adjust and acclimate themselves.  They also had limited choice.  There was one option for phone service, one machine to hear radio, two choices for TV and no such thing as the web.

If they were alive today they would be pretty much stuck with one local phone service provider, but of course if they had broadband they could replace it with VOIP.  But their choice of cable or satellite directly impacts the availability of broadband that can support their VOIP needs. Oh, and they’d have to figure out how to get it to work with one of those WiFi things that their great-grandkids have at home. Then when they go out to get that new Buick they’d have to choose between standard radio or one of two satellite radio providers.

That’s just for starters.  The great-grandkids keep asking about something called TiVo, or maybe an alternative DVR.  (What is it with these whipper-snappers and their acronyms?)

And what of this web thing?  Is it the same thing as AOL, or Earthlink or that other thing the Internet?

I’m no fan of Sen. Stevens, but I can definitely understand his confusion.  Unfortunately he’s a very powerful man and as such we need guys like Jarvis keeping tabs on him.

Student athletes my a–

It seems that 42 of the 65 schools with teams in the NCAA basketball tournament starting tomorrow graduated LESS than 50% of their players who entered the schools between 1994 and 1997.

Another interesting tidbit from this article on FoxSports is that if those numbers hold true for the 04-05 academic year then all those schools with under 50% graduation rates will face penalties like a loss of scholarships and exclusion from the tournament.

Looks like hot job titles next year will include "Professor of Underwater Basket Weaving" and "Doctor of the J".

Sun Doesn’t Just Shine for Newspapers

There’s a new organization dedicated to "open government", or Freedom of Information if you like.  The two major newspapers here in the NC Piedmont Triad are participating in the movement (The Greensboro News & Record, The Winston-Salem Journal), as I’m sure are most of the major newspapers in the U.S.

But while the newspapers bring much needed exposure and "oomph" for the effort, they are not the main benefactors or the primary impetus for the movement.

As one editorialist pointed out most people don’t understand that public information is open to them.  Rather, they abdicated the role of government overseer to the journalists, the "Fourth Estate."

That is changing.  The creation of the world’s cheapest printing press (the Web) a little over ten years ago initiated an era when average people began to see themselves as grass roots media.  And when blogs (websites for dummies) hit the online mainstream we had a cadre of Benjamin Franklins born overnight.

Now, with RSS, our cadre of Franklins has grown to a small army of Pulitzers (Hearsts?), and they will be the true benefactors and impetus of the open government movement.  And if I was anyone of influence or power they would scare the bejesus out of me.