Category Archives: Weblogs

Eats in Greensboro

Greensboro, NC is about a half hour east of where I (and my lovely family) live in Lewisville, NC.  Since we’re right outside of Winston-Salem we usually spend our time there, but we’ve had some opportunities to go to Greensboro and we’d like to go more. So I thought I’d pick the brains of Greensboro’s bloggers for places to eat.  Following are recommendations mined from some blogs and comments on those blogs about eating in Greensboro.  These aren’t in any particular order, just a random sampling of what I found while browsing the blogs of Greensboro’s finest.  I’ll update this as I come across more.

Monk’s Cheese Steaks and Cheeseburgers
1030 Summit Avenue
275-1105
Recommendations from David Wharton’s and Ed Cone’s blogs.
Quote from Wharton: "Monk’s Cheese Steaks and Cheeseburgers in the Northeast Shopping Center knows exactly
how to make them. Visiting Monk’s is like taking a little trip to an
everyday New York eatery, complete with an airbrushed mural on the wall
featuring the Twin Towers. The staff is friendly in that New York kind
of way, the place is immaculate, and the cheese steaks … oh, yes.

The
meat comes handsomely piled on the soft bun, laced with just the right
amount of gooey cheese, onions, peppers, and seasoning. The fries were
hot and delicious and the service was fast. The only complaint comes
from my cardiologist."

Ganache
403 N Elm St
Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 230-2253

Quote from Sean Coon in the comments on Cone’s blog: "by far the best cheesecake i’ve had in town to date is the chocolate chip cheesecake at ganache"

Ghassan’s
3 Locations in Greensboro
Battleground: (336) 273-2266
State Street: (336) 378-1000
Coliseum(336) 294-4060
Quote from Jerry Bledsoe on Cone’s blog: "Damn, all these Blogsboro soft-bread Cheez-Whiz (it ain’t even food)lemmings. Try a real cheese steak. Go to Ghassan’s."  And another quote from Wharton in the same post comments: "Yes, Ghassan’s fries are special. From the taste, they’re not fried in vegetable oil. Probably beef tallow."

Solaris Tapas Restaurant & Bar
125 Summit Ave.
Greensboro, NC, 27401
(336)-378-0198

Quote from Potato Stew: "We’ve been to Solaris twice, and we enjoyed it quite a bit. Very tasty tapas. We’ll be going back there more…"

Cafe Europa
200 N Davie St
Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 389-1010

Quote from Roch101 on Plead the First: "The food is good, the wine list extensive and dining on the terrace this time of year is a treat."

Undercurrent
600 South Elm Street
Greensboro, NC 27406
(336) 370-1266
Quote from Patrick Eakes on Plead the First: "It is on the more expensive side, but provides plenty of coziness and a romantic setting."

223 South Elm Restaurant
223 South Elm Street
Greensboro, NC 27401
(336) 272-3331
Quote from Potato Stew: "It was great! Very interesting menu. I had the trout which had a black
pepper goat cheese on top that was amazing. I would defenitely
recommend the restaurant."

Bistro Sofia
616 Dolley Madison Rd.
Greensboro, NC 27410
(336) 855-1313
Quote from, well, me: "Celeste and I had dinner there a couple of months ago and I can tell you it is one of the two or three best meals we’ve had since we moved to NC.  Can’t recommend it highly enough."

Update: Ed Cone has posted a list of restaurant recommendations here.  I’m going to shamelessly steal his list which you’ll find below…thanks Ed:

My personal list would start out something like this:

Best Indian food in Greensboro: Saffron

Best sushi in Greensboro: Sushi Republic (formerly Sushi 101)

Best fine dining in Greensboro: Undercurrent

Best cheesesteak in Greensboro: Monk’s Cheesesteaks and Cheeseburgers

Best pizza in Greensboro: Vito’s (traditional); PieWorks

Best soul food in Greensboro: Madison Kitchen/UHoP

Best low-key seafood in Greensboro: Bert’s

Best Vietnamese food in Greensboro: Saigon (mentioned by Astro Boy in the comments, I concur)

Best wings in Greensboro: Minj (via Wharton)

Best carniverous experience in Greensboro: Leblon churrascaria (the usual suspects, such as Ruth’s Chris, are available for traditional steakhouse experience).

Best barbecue? Tough call. I will vote for the Brunswick Stew at Stamey’s.

Watch What You Say

Here’s a piece of news for all you trolls and haters out there; watch what you write/say or you could be on the wrong end of a very expensive lawsuit.  A woman in Florida recently won an $11.3 million defamation suit  and a lawyer in Georgia won a libel suit against a former client who’d started a blog and written some nasty things about him.  According to the article about the Georgia lawyer bloggers have been considered bulletproof because they weren’t worth suing, i.e. they didn’t have deep pockets like media companies.  Apparently that’s changing:

Legal analysts say the lawsuits are challenging a mind-set that has
long surrounded blogging: that most bloggers essentially are
"judgment-proof" because they — unlike traditional media such as
newspapers, magazines and television outlets — often are ordinary
citizens who don’t have a lot of money. Recent lawsuits by Banks and
others who say they have had their reputations harmed or their privacy
violated have been aimed not just at cash awards but also at silencing
their critics.

Later in the article the founder of the Media Bloggers Association recommends that bloggers bone up on libel law because eventually someone’s going to get sued and lose their home. 

My recommendation?  When you’re writing about someone think of it has having a conversation about one of your neighbors or co-workers.  It’s perfectly fine to have an opinion about the person and you can tell anyone you want what that opinion is, but you can’t make accusatory statements about that person unless you’re ready to back it up with proof.  For example it’s perfectly legal to say "I think Joe is an amoral jerk" but it’s a completely different thing to say "Joe’s a pervert who diddles little boys."  Statement number one is an opinion, statement number two is an accusation.  The worst that can happen with statement number one is everyone you say it to might think you’re a jerk or Joe might challenge you to a fight, but with the second statement you could end up in court.

For the record I love everyone…we’re all God’s children…blah, blah, blah…don’t sue me.

For Those Who Think Blogs are a Waste of Space, Time or Whatever

I’ve been asked more than once what I like about blogs.  I’ve produced a variety of answers but when I distill it down I come up with two words: prose and variety.  Up until a couple of years ago I could only read those writers that the media gatekeepers let through, but now thanks to blogs I can read all kinds of writing from pros and amateurs alike, and the scary part for the pros is that the amateurs’ prose is usually more interesting and colorful.  They have far more distinctive voices and because they aren’t edited (for the most part) it comes through loud and clear.  Here are two recent example that I’m sure would not have found the light of day just five years ago:

From Driftglass, taking on David Brooks’, whom he calls "Bobo", and his comparison of our reaction to Congressman Foley’s misdeeds to The Vagina Monologues:

No matter how many fleets of atomic-powered back-hoes the GOP leases
for a million dollars a minute from Halliburton to deepen the trenches
into which they have already sunk the bar for the minimally acceptable
level of degenerate Republican behavior, worms like Bobo will always
insist that somehow, some way, the non-GOP majority is somehow equally
awful and equally culpable.

Behold this snip from his latest masterpiece of mendacity…

This is a tale of two predators. The first is a congressman who
befriended teenage pages. He sent them cajoling instant messages asking
them to describe their sexual habits, so he could get his jollies.

The
second is a secretary, who invited a 13-year-old girl from her
neighborhood into her car and kissed her. Then she invited the girl up
to her apartment, gave her some vodka, took off her underwear and gave
her a satin teddy to wear.

Then she had sex with the girl,
which was interrupted when the girl’s mother called. Then she made the
girl masturbate in front of her and taught her some new techniques.

The
first predator, of course, is Mark Foley, the Florida congressman. The
second predator is a character in Eve Ensler’s play, “The Vagina
Monologues.”

And having “established” somewhere in the depleted nimbus of brain
cells that still scurry around in his soft head that a FICTIONAL
CHARACTER from a play is somehow exactly the same as a real child
predator, notice how his next paragraph begins (emphasis added)

“Foley is now universally reviled. But the Ensler play…”

And off we go on a dissertation on vile, lefty art and how “cosmopolitan culture” has just gone and ruined the social fabric.

Rooned I tell’s ya!

Desperate
to evade the question of why a child predator was allowed to range and
hunt free at the heart of the Family Values Party, and why virtually
the entire Party of Personal Responsibility is now bending every oar
hysterically ducking their Personal Responsibility, Bobo begins to
unload the strawmen by the job lot:

But why is one sexual predator despised and the other celebrated?

…he asks.

See kids, this is what happens when you drink the Koolaid, then lick
the Koolaid powder off the floor, then smoke the packet in came in:
Lying becomes so automatic to you – pulling out of your ass whatever
works to cover up the Scandal of the Day becomes such a reflex – that
you lose the capacity to distinguish between a character in a play and a real Congressman who hunts real children…

The honest answer to Bobo’s absurd question is, of course, is that Art is supposed to be provocative you imbecile

It is supposed to illuminate, not laminate. 

And
to get that job done, we allow Artists enormous latitude. We allow them
to create scary villains. Flawed heroes. Plots that creep us out. In
literature, we allow the Good Guys to lose. Badly. Or to drown. Or let
the life-saving fire they finally managed to strike with their frozen
fingers and last match to be smothered by a dollop of snow falling from
an overhanging limb…

And we allow it. Hell, we demand it. We need Provocation like we need
air: Without it, the Southron Slave Empire that the Red Staters
no-sot-secretly covet would be entering its three-hundred-and-fiftieth
year of continuous operation. Rape and murder of non-whites would still
be a God-sanctioned perk, and Dr. King would have ended up at the end
of a Conservative Christian rope the first time he opened his mouth and
said, “I am a Man.”

Congressmen, on the other hand, are not
hired to peel the skin off of the human soul and show us the miracles
and murder that contend in our hearts.

Congressmen are hired to do a job of work much like house painting and pothole-filling. 

Congressmen are not hired to molest children.

Congressmen are not hired to cover up for the molesters of children.

This
is a concept which is not beyond David Brooks’ comprehension, but
beyond his honor. He is not actually dumb enough not to know better,
because he is not a stupid man, but a despicable man.

When he dissembles to deflect judgment away from child sex predators and their enablers in his Party, he does it by choice.

Because he is a Good Republican and not a Good American.

Because
it does not matter how many times Republicans hits your grandma upside
the head with a shovel, Bobo will forever waddle onto the crime scene,
pick up the bloody weapon and screech, “But the Liberals…”

And from Fec, on describing a conservative blog conference in Greensboro last week (this boy can turn a phrase):

Weird moment:  Jim Capo asking Scott Johnson
to repeat his statement that the MSM was the mouthpiece of the
Democratic Party. The words were almost visible as they wafted over the
sheep. Capo followed the silly words in disbelief as they slowly
settled on the garbage.

Weird moment: Understanding that this is the future of the GOP and we are doomed, doomed I tell you.

Weird moment: Talking to the John Locke folks and realizing that
particularly in politics, nice guys finish last. They don’t understand
that all things are possible once you surrender your integrity. Man,
that’s too evil even for me, but worthy of contemplation. The idea
being that someone like me can thrive in the complete absence of
integrity.

Unless things change radically you won’t see writing like that in any op-ed column or on any mainstream media outlet of any kind.  They have to worry about ad sales and other business niceties while the others can speak/write their minds.  It’s kind of like barbershop banter writ large and I love it.

BTW, I think I’m going to adopt Driftglass’s "Because he is a Good Republican and Not a Good American" but replace "Republican" with "Politician." 

Also, Fec’s "all things are possible once you surrender your integrity" is this decade’s "carpe diem."

Update: As a raving moderate I am genetically predisposed to seeing both sides of every coin.  Here’s one reason you would be justified in thinking that blogs are a waste of, well, everything. Can we say TMI?

Stupid Lawyer

Budvase
I know, I know, many of you will probably find the title of this post redundant, but I’ve known at least one really fine lawyer in my day.  Maybe one and a half.  Anyway, here’s a post on bookofjoe about a cease and desist letter he, Joe, received from a lawyer who was supposedly defending the patent of one of her clients.  In the letter she insists that bookofjoe immediately stop manufacturing or selling the product pictured to the left.  Small problem:  Joe didn’t manufacture or sell the vase, he simply wrote about it. 

Maybe ten seconds of due-diligence by the attorney or one of her paralegals would have prevented this waste of time. But wait, maybe that’s the point.  Ten seconds of due-diligence doesn’t rack up the billable hours that penning a carefully crafted cease and desist form letter does.  Ironically the ten seconds of due-diligence might have actually led to more billable hours since Joe conveniently supplied a link to the seller of the patent-offending device. 

Ah, lawyers.

A Square Attempting to Square the Square

Esbee posits that if I link to her and Joe Jon to me and she to Ken then we’ll have a perfect blogsquare.  As a lifelong square I find this a comfortable proposition. She also links to an interesting post by Ken Otterbourg, managing editor at the Journal, that discusses the evolving role of "citizen journalism" here in Camel City. Ken was prompted to write the post after Joe Jon turned the tables on one of Ken’s reporters during an interview.

Winston-Salem Journal Losing Some Talent

Joe Murphy is leaving the Winston-Salem Journal for a new job at the Denver Post.  From what I could tell Joe, along with former Journal staffer Adam Howell,  spearheaded the Journal’s (and Media General’s) foray into blogging and other online initiatives.  This is a definite loss for the Journal and the Winston-Salem online community, as small as it is.  I’ve heard that the Denver Post is a leader in the newspaper industry in terms of their online initiatives and I’m sure this is a great career move for Joe.  Here’s to wishing him the best of luck and let’s hope he doesn’t forget us little people!

I Like the Local Newspapers’ Blogs, but…

I’ve been a big fan of the local newspapers’ blogs for a while.  My hometown paper, the Winston-Salem Journal was late to the party but they’ve been launching blogs at a nice clip lately.  The Greensboro News & Record was very early to the blogging scene and they host quite a few good blogs.  On top of that the N&R has also turned some independent bloggers like Dave Hoggard into regular columnists.

But neither of those fine papers has done what the San Francisco Chronicle has done.  To wit, the Chron has turned "intrepid sexblogger/podcaster/author Violet Blue"(from the Boing Boing piece where I found this) into their newest columnnist.  Her beat, as it were, is sexuality and you can read her first column here

No offense to Hogg and the other local columnists, but I’m thinking that Violet Blue’s columns are gonna grab more attention than covering the status of the Ice House ever will and I’m wondering if the Piedmont Triad could boast something comparable.  Sure this is Bible-NASCAR-BBQ country, and it’s a given that Ms. Blue has much more raw material for her column in SF than we have here, but we’ve gotta be able to do something a little more risque than Fathers After 40. How about this: a column that explores the intricacies of flirting two pews over, finding alternate uses for BBQ sauce (hate to say it, but the vinegar style might prove problematic) and how to really enjoy watching a bunch of paunchy white guys drive in circles.  Hey, it’s a start.

Severe Blog Navel Gazing

My buddy Fecund Stench asked me to participate in this rather silly chain-mail-like activity so I’m obliging him:

1. Do you like the look and the contents of your blog?
Yup.

2. Does your family know about your blog?
Yup, and usually they are ashamed to admit it.  I’m the family dork.

3: Can you tell your friends about your blog? Do you consider it a private thing?
Not sure how something posted online could be private.

4: Do you just read the blogs of those who comment on your blog? or you try to discover new blogs?

The more I read the better my strenuous efforts at procrastination.

5: Did your blog positively affect your mind? Give an example.
Screeeeeee!

6: What does the number of visitors to your blog mean? Do you use a traffic counter?

It means I don’t know very many people and no.

7: Did you imagine how other bloggers look like?
I’m assuming I understand the question since the tortured construct is difficult to understand like. My answer: Aren’t they all fat middle-aged guys with a bad haircut, stained underwear and four days of stubble on their spittle covered chins?  Oh, that’s just me.

8: Do you think blogging has any real benefit?
Beyond enabling my narcissistic tendencies I don’t think so.  But I like my blog so I really don’t give a damn if it (blogging) does or doesn’t have any real benefit.

9: Do you think that the Blogsphere is a stand alone community separated from the real world?
Bloggers are breathing while they type, right?

10: Do some political blogs scare you? Do you avoid them?
They bore me, and since they don’t seek me out I haven’t had to engage my anti-blog flares.

11: Do you think that criticizing your blog is useful?
Well, I think it’s brilliant and I like to agree with myself so I don’t ever criticize it.  Now if you’re asking if I think getting criticism from other people is useful then I’d have to say yes.

12: Have you ever thought about what happen to your blog in case you died?
That’s the least of my worries.  I’m more worried about who would get my collection of navel-lint I’ve collected over the years.

13: Which blogger had the greatest impression on you?

Alton Hedgelick.

14: Which blogger you think is the most similar to you?

Felbert Simpsonian.

15: Name a song you want to listen to.

Oklahoma

Can you tell I have a headache?

Hey, the Winston-Salem Journal made bookofjoe!

I think this might be a sign of the times:  to me it’s a pretty big deal that a Winston-Salem Journal article about a K-9 mold investigating company in Winston-Salem was picked up by Charlottesville, VA blogger bookofjoe.  Why?  Because I can almost guarantee you that bookofjoe has a wider global audience than the Journal, if not more daily readers.

Who’d have thunk just two years ago that a guy working out of his house, by himself, could have a broader reach than a mainstream newspaper that’s part of a larger media company and has the requisite staff of reporters, editors, ad reps, etc.?  Kind of cool.

Good Reason’s to Attend This Year’s ConvergeSouth

If you weren’t already convinced that this year’s ConvergeSouth (North Carolina’s own blogfest) then here are two new reasons that popped up today:

Need I come up with more reasons?  Well there’s this: it’s free.

On another note: why don’t you sign up to eat at News & Record editor-extraordinaire John Robinson’s dinner?  I think he’d enjoy your company.