Category Archives: Current Affairs

Don’t Buy Gas from the Bastards on Old Bridge Road

GashikeSee that picture on the right?  You might have to click on it to see it at full size to see that I paid $3.39 for 87 octane unleaded gas. I took the picture with my camera phone right after filling up at a station on Old Bridge Road in Prince William County, VA earlier this week. It was the day after the BP announcement re. the pipeline in Alaska being shut down for a while and a miraculous $.40/gallon jump occured overnight.

I bought there because I was on fumes and didn’t have the opportunity to look elsewhere, but just down the road I found gas that was $.20/gallon cheaper and that trend stayed everywhere I drove.  I’ll take my hits for not looking for gas sooner and denying myself the chance to find a better price, but I can at least call them out on their gouging. 

On the way home last night I got a tank full in Petersburg, VA for $2.92. 

And for the record I don’t have anything against higher oil prices (that whole supply and demand thing), but I do have something against gougers.

A Life of “Deferred Success”

It seems that the teachers union in England, the Professional Association of Teachers, is asking its members to avoid describing their students as clever or giving their students awards for being clever as to avoid causing the students to be bullied…for being clever.  This is the same group that last year asked its members to replace the term ‘failure’ with ‘deferred success.’  You can read about it here.

Thus my life accomplishments have now been re-categorized.

Climb a Tree, Get DNA Profiled

You know how a lot of people have been bent out of shape because of the Patriot Act and their fear that Uncle Sam is becoming Big Brother?  Well, maybe it’s because they fear that we’re going to become a society that allows something like what happened recently in the UK to happen here. Excerpt is from the Daily Mail article:

To the 12-year-old friends planning to build themselves a den, the cherry tree seemed an inviting source of material.

But the afternoon adventure turned into a frightening ordeal for
Sam Cannon, Amy Higgins and Katy Smith after they climbed into the 20ft
tree – then found themselves hauled into a police station and locked in
cells for up to two hours.

Their shoes were removed and mugshots, DNA samples and mouth swabs were taken.

Officers told the children they had been seen damaging the tree which is in a wooded area of public land near their homes.

Questioned by police, the scared friends admitted they had
broken some loose branches because they had wanted to build a tree
house, but said they did not realise what they had done was wrong.

Officers considered charging the children with criminal damage
but eventually decided a reprimand – the equivalent of a caution for
juveniles – was sufficient.

Although the reprimand does not amount to court action and the children do not have a criminal record, their details will be kept on file for up to five years.

Tax Cheats

David Cay Johnston is a New York Times reporter who wrote Perfectly Legal, a book I highly recommend if you want to: a. Get thoroughly pissed off and b. Get a better understanding of how our tax system does and/or does not work. Johnston has an article in today’s Times about how, according to a report from the US Senate Permanent Investigations subcommittee, tax cheating by the superrich is out of control.  Here’s some excerpts from the article:

The report details how the Quellos Group, a tax shelter boutique
based in Seattle, “concocted a tax shelter” using $9.6 billion “worth
of fake securities transactions that were used to generate billions of
dollars of fake capital losses.”

Senator Levin said that when
investigators asked for trading records they were first told the trades
were private, over-the-counter transactions. He said investigators
asked for trading tickets or other evidence of who owned the $9.6
billion worth of stock and were told the stocks were never owned by the
parties involved.

“They just wrote down numbers on paper and
claimed losses,” he said. “It was just like fantasy baseball, except
the taxes not paid were for real.”

And more:

The investigation, which took 18 months, involved 74 subpoenas, 80
interviews and the collection of more than two million documents, and
yet Senator Levin said “the six cases we present are just examples,
just a pinhole look.”

The 400-page report recommends eight
changes, some of them aimed at going after the law and accounting
firms, banks and investment advisers that the report says enable tax
schemes that rely on complexity, secrecy and compartmentalizing
information so that advisers can claim they had no idea that the
overall transaction was a fraud.

“We need to significantly
strengthen the aiding and abetting statutes to get at the lawyers and
accountants and other advisers who enable this cheating,” Senator Levin
said, adding that “we need major changes in law to stop the use of tax
havens” by tax cheats.

And finally this:

The report details a scheme created for Mr. Saban to avoid more than
$300 million in taxes from sale of his half interest in the Family
Channel and related properties.

Mr. Saban told Senate
investigators that he never understood the transactions but undertook
them after asking two questions of Mr. Wilk and his personal tax
lawyer, Matthew Krane.

Mr. Saban said he asked whether the deals
were legal and whether a major law firm would certify them as proper.
The two lawyers, Mr. Saban said, answered “yes to both,” so he went
ahead.

Later, when Mr. Saban learned that he had paid $54 million
in fees to Quellos; Cravath Swaine & Moore, a New York law firm;
and others for what turned out to be what the report described as fake
transactions, he said he felt “misled, lied to and cheated.”

Lewis
R. Steinberg, who as a Cravath Swaine partner helped design the deal
and wrote an opinion letter attesting that it was more likely than not
to work as a tax shelter, told Senate investigators last week that he
relied on assurances from Quellos and Mr. Johnson that real
transactions took place, not fake trades. Mr. Steinberg, who is now at
UBS Securities, another firm named in the report, is a prominent tax
lawyer and in 2004 was chairman of the tax section of the American Bar Association.

After reading Perfectly Legal and Conspiracy of Fools I’m convinced that we’ll never see tax-reform or even an even playing field because the real white collar crooks and crook-enablers are in the legal and accounting professions and they have an inordinate influence on the Hill and throughout the halls of federal and state governments.  Unfortunately I think Senator Levin and his allies are fighting a lost cause.

Another Reason That Forsyth County’s Election Board Was Right

If you’ve been following the saga of the Forsyth County’s Election Board over the last year or so you’ll remember that the former director of elections left because the board would not support her recommendation that the county adopt Diebold’s paperless ballot system for future elections. In a post last May I linked to several pieces that really made the board’s stance look like a good one and now there’s some new information that show the Diebold machines are even more susceptible to fraud than previously realized and of course that makes the board’s decision look even better.

Hanging chads anyone?

Does Evangelical Christian = Republican?

There’s a fascinating article in the New York Times (found via Ed Cone) about a pastor at an evangelical mega-church in Minnesota who denounced the practice of churches closely identifying with a particular political party or getting involved in political issues.  The pastor, the Rev. Gregory A. Boyd, refused to allow anti-abortion activists to set up tables in the church, refused to endorse political candidates or to allow pamphlets for candidates to be distributed and eventually gave a series of sermons titled "’The Cross and the Sword’ in which he said the church should steer clear of politics, give up
moralizing on sexual issues, stop claiming the United States as a
“Christian nation” and stop glorifying American military campaigns."  In the process he lost about 20% of his congregants and a church fundraising campaign fell well short of the church’s goal, but he says he has no regrets.

What is most interesting to me is that as I was reading the article I realized that I had assumed all along that all evangelicals are right-wing, super-conservative, pro-war, Bush evangelists.  I had fallen into the trap of lumping everyone into the same category, of not giving evangelical Christians the credit for being able to think for themselves.

Kind of scary how easy that is to do.

NAH-NAH-NAH-NAH

You know how little kids will plug their ears and yell "nah-nah-nah" when you’re telling them something they don’t want to hear?  Well apparently the US intelligence czar John Negroponte is doing the same thing.  According to this piece on the Harper’s Magazine site he is not granting approval for the CIA to do a new national intelligence estimate for Iraq, and the theory is that he doesn’t want one done because he wants to protect the President from a situation like one he had when the last NIE was released in 2004 and promptly leaked to the New York Times.

If true doesn’t this make Negroponte the czar of anti-intelligence?

You Don’t Need CNN to See Lebanon Photos

It’s not news that the internet has changed how we get information, but many people who aren’t techies or are over the age of 30 may not know about some mainstream web services out there that allow any person to disseminate his or her perspective of events to the general public.  A perfect case in point is the online photo sharing site Flickr which was purchased by Yahoo! a while back and how it is being used by photographers to get out pictures from the war zone in Lebanon.

For those not familiar with Flickr think of it as an online photo album that anyone can use for free and upload pictures that can either be made private or can be shared with the world at large.  What made Flickr revolutionary when it first launched is that it allows users to "tag" each photo with descriptive words which means that anyone can search for photos by those tags.  So if you want to find photos with the tag ‘lebanon’ you simply visit Flickr and use the search field and type in ‘lebanon’.  Here’s a string of Lebanon photos from a user named "arabist", but please be forewarned that there are some graphic photos there so don’t look if you’re squeamish.

Flickr is just one example of how a seemingly simple mass-market service can totally upend a traditional information paradigm.  It continues to be fascinating to me to watch how our traditional news and information purveyors adjust to their new environment of an audience that is increasingly attracted by other information sources and of course there’s a lot of debate about what it means to traditional media outlets, but I’m convinced it’s better for us as a society to be able to get as many images, or perspectives if you will, in addition to the traditional filter provided by the traditional media outlets.

Update: Here’s the blog of a BBC journalist in Beirut and it uses another free web service (Blogger, owned by Google) and here’s his Flickr stream.

Winston-Salem Government’s Use of Eminent Domain is Stupid and Immoral

Winston-Salem, NC wants to seize some property for redevelopment using eminent domain despite the fact that they have not exhausted their other options.  You can read the entire story here in the Winston-Salem Journal, but here are the highlights:

  • The city is trying to redevelop a strip of land on Liberty Street between the Smith Reynolds airport and downtown. They’ve set aside $500,000 to acquire all the lots.
  • One landowner, Charles Baldwin, has a competing offer for the land from Firetree Ltd., a company that wants to build a halfway house there.
  • The city is offering $145,000 for the land and Firetree is offering $172,500.  The property is appraised by the city at $172,000, which means they are taxing Mr. Baldwin based on that number but offering to buy it for $27,000 less.  The city claims that the difference is because of environmental issues with the property, but since the city acknowledges those issues exist doesn’t that mean their tax assessment should reflect the lower value?  That’s the immoral part of this whole thing.
  • The city is suing to seize the property using eminent domain, but one component of eminent domain law is that the landowner be compensated fairly.  In what universe does an offer that is more than 15% less than an existing offer OR assessed valued by the city constitute fair compensation?  And what genius figured that suing would cost the city less than $28,000 which is really all they’d have to offer to get the land?  That’s the stupid part of this whole deal.

I truly hope that the city gets slapped around on this deal.  Whether or not you support eminent domain in concept I think any reasonable person would find it unconscionable that the city would tax a landowner at a higher assessed value than they are willing to pay for the land themselves.  Simply put that is total bull excrement.