Doctor vs. Big Pharma and Government: Burzynski at a/perture

Cancer is insidious and I'd venture a guess that almost every person in America has been touched by the disease.  Whether it's a family member, a co-worker or a friend we know someone who has had cancer and we've seen first hand how it decimates them and their loved ones.  That's why watching Burzynski, the movie will likely infuriate you.

The movie is a documentary about a doctor and chemist named, you guessed it, Burzynski who discovered a revolutionary treatment for cancer more than 30 years ago. Thanks to battles with myriad government and private entities his treatment has had difficulty getting approved for advanced clinical trials, and has only been available to a limited number of patients as a result.  That's all I'm going to say about the actual content of the movie for fear of spoiling it, but I will say that while I found the movie to be obviously slanted towards supporting Dr. Burzynski, it also provides compelling and objective evidence in support of its stance.  I also found it refreshingly absent of the kind of stunts that Michael Moore has made popular with his movies, and instead relies on public documents, interviews and public hearings to make its case.

All that's not to say that the movie is boring or slow.  To the contrary the pacing seems just right, there's very little redundancy in the evidence presented and yet it still seems thorough.  As a result Burzynski is compelling, the story infuriating and it's a movie I highly recommend seeing.

Burzynski, the movie is appearing this weekend (May 29-30) through next week at a/perture cinema (across from Mellow Mushroom on Fourth Street in downtown Winston-Salem) was written, directed and produced by Eric Merola. You can find show times on a/perture's website.


Discover more from Befuddled

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Doctor vs. Big Pharma and Government: Burzynski at a/perture

  1. D. Navarro's avatarD. Navarro

    You seem to be slanted towards the government and Big Phrma. You have no idea of what antineoplastons can do for those with cancer and forgot that it was the government trying to steal this man’s discovery. How ethical is our government. Tool.

    Reply
  2. Unknown's avatarJon Lowder

    I think you’re misreading my post. I just said that the film showed a slant towards supporting the doctor, but that the filmmakers used data to back up that position. Also, I think it’s pretty clear that I found the case compelling and that it angered me that the government officials behaved the way they did. And if by being as objective as I can be in my assessment of the film makes me a tool then I guess I’m guilty as charged. Not that I give a shit.

    Reply

Leave a comment