Eminent Domain Change Imminent

Looks like the eminent domain legislation that Winston-Salem wants enacted to allow them to redevelop blighted properties is about to clear the NC House of Representatives and then move on to the Senate.  More background here

Discover more from Befuddled

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

2 thoughts on “Eminent Domain Change Imminent

  1. AMR's avatarAMR

    IMHO, this is scary, scary, scary. The idea that developers who want $$$ could walk over to City Hall and work out a deal whereby a landowner could have his/her property taken away from them is frightening.
    Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London (if you have time, find the actual opinion — Wiki is your friend for a quick review!). If you make it to the bottom, you will read that in this case, the so called “benefit/public use” (the backbone of the eminent domain principle) never materialized. Shocker.
    I’m not arguing against the redevelopment of blighted properties, but if people don’t want their properties redeveloped and you’re not in the business of paving highways or building schools or other necessary public facilities, you’re just S.O.L..

    Reply
  2. Unknown's avatarJon Lowder

    AMR I agree that it’s scary. I seem to remember that there was a case
    in New England where a town used eminent domain to take some houses
    that were old but still inhabited and the intended use was something
    like a commercial development (mall or offices?). I have no problem
    with developers buying land and redeveloping it but I get a little
    hinky when governments start taking property for similar purposes.

    Reply

Leave a reply to Jon Lowder Cancel reply