Mr. Snow Back at Work, but Not at Lewisville Elementary

According to the report from WXII the investigation of Mr. Snow by the Forsyth County Sheriff’s Department is continuing, but by state law the school system had to make a decision about his employment status by last night so they gave him a non-teaching role within the school system.  On the boob tube this morning the Fox morning show had a scroll at the bottom of the screen about Mr. Snow and I thought it said that he had been cleared by the sheriff’s office, but the story on their website is the same as WXII’s. The stories also say that Lewisville Elementary’s parents were notified of the decision yesterday, but since our kids are all now in middle or high school we didn’t get the message. 

The Winston-Salem Journal offers more depth in their coverage.  Here’s what they have about the school system’s move:

School officials
are allowed to suspend teachers with pay for 90 days. Yesterday was the
last day that Snow could be suspended, so school officials had to
either reach an agreement with him to extend the suspension or allow
him to return to work.

“We have decided not to ask for an extension of his suspension,” Davis said.

“We were at the
90th day,” he said. “We simply felt, based upon the information we had,
that we had to move forward, so we certainly were in a situation where
we had to balance our interest in protecting students with Mr. Snow’s
right to be employed in some manner.”

Snow’s new position is a lateral transfer, meaning that there is no change in his pay.

As an instructional technologist, Snow will help teachers develop ways to integrate technology into the curriculum.

“Our assistant
superintendent for technology was familiar with him. He’s not a techie
person, but he knows how to use technology in the classroom,”
Superintendent Don Martin said.

Snow will work with teachers after school and occasionally will work in schools during the instructional day.

He will not work
directly with students, but he might demonstrate model lessons in
classrooms with the teachers present, said Betty Weycker, the assistant
superintendent for technology.

No matter what the sheriff’s office findings turn out to be the school system’s decision here is going to make for some interesting discussion.  The fact that they are acknowledging that Mr. Snow will have interaction with students at some point is not going to please the parents at those schools since they don’t know anything about the man other than he’s been accused of something and since no one knows what that something is they’re going to do what 99% of humanity does and assume the worst.  They aren’t going to be happy that their children will be exposed to someone of whom they assume the worst.

Here’s another quote from the Journal article given by the school system’s attorney:

“Based upon the information that has been provided to us, this is an appropriate resolution at this time,” Davis said.

It seems to me that the sheriff’s department (and maybe Tom Keith’s office) have put the school system in a tough spot by not getting this investigation done in a more timely fashion.  By state law they had to either reinstate him or get him to agree to an extension of his suspension.  Unfortunately for everyone involved they are not allowed to describe the charges against Mr. Snow, only saying that he’s been suspended due to accusations of impropriety.  Everyone assumes it’s against a student, but it could have been a fellow teacher or employee at the school.  Why does it make a difference?  Because parents would be a lot less nervous about their kid being around an adult accused of cussing out a co-worker than one accused of inappropriate conduct with a student.

And what if the charges against Mr. Snow are false and were made by a co-worker who doesn’t like him?  Then the extended investigation prevents him from clearing his name and keeps him from a job he loves and away from kids who thrived under his tutelage.   

I don’t know Mr. Snow personally, having only met him in passing at school functions, but my wife worked with him when she was a chaperone for the 5th grade trip to Camp Hanes and several friends have known him and his family for years.  Two of my children were students of his.  From what I know I can tell you that I would not hesitate to allow my kids in his classroom.  And although a lot of my feeling is based on what I’ve heard from friends and family, part of it is based on my belief that if there was something to be found, if the accusations were true then the school system wouldn’t dare put him in a position with any interaction with students.  If there’s one thing they fear more than breaking state law it’s opening themselves up to possible lawsuits from parents if they ended up putting students in harms way.

Let me end by saying that if the sheriff and Mr. Keith want to serve their community in this case then they need to light a fire under the butts of whoever’s running this investigation and get it done.


Discover more from Befuddled

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

4 thoughts on “Mr. Snow Back at Work, but Not at Lewisville Elementary

  1. Victims Rights's avatarVictims Rights

    The investigators do need to speed it up but from what I heard they were getting ready to do something when some new info came forward that needed to be looked into, so that is why it is taking so long. I so wished I could tell everyone what is about to happen but I can’t everyone will have to wait and see and it makes me so upset knowing what i know and hearing what i hear b/c others dont know what i know

    Reply
  2. William's avatarWilliam

    Well, it is interesting that one of the original teachers who was involved in smearing Mr. Snow’s name has also left Lewisville under “mysterious circumstances”. From what I have heard, the reasons for her leaving definitely put her reliability into question and therefore put the original accusation against Mr. Snow into serious question (not to mention that the first thorough investigation showed nothing.) If you think about it, it was this first accusation by the teacher(s) that started all the bad publicity against Mr. Snow. I have never seen an example of so much bad publicity against someone merely on accusations (not being charged).
    THE DA/sherriff’s department does seem bent on finding something /anything they can find on Mr. Snow so they don’t look like fools for investigating an innocent person for so long. It could be that officials in Raleigh at the state attorney general’s office will have to get involved before the mishandlings on the local level are exposed.

    Reply
  3. SHOE's avatarSHOE

    I do not know the details of this situation but something is wrong. If the allegations against Mr. Snow are false then this has been handled wrong, If the allegations are true then this has been handled wrong.
    Sometimes the difference between criminal misconduct and ethical-misconduct is a fine line and hard to prove either way.
    For our DA to press charges the criminal evidence has to be overwhelming and the burden of proof in criminal prosecution is with the State to prove. If nothing criminal took place then the DA & Sherriff will not press charges. Will that be the end of it?
    If no criminal misconduct occurred or it is unable to be proven then it will be up to the School System or State to revoke Mr. Snow’s teaching certification for ethical violations if the proof is there. If the school is unable or unwilling to relieve Mr. Snow of his employment, then any concerned citizen can contact Mr. Harry Wilson hwilson@dpi.state.nc.us (919) 715-1310 with proof. Mr. Wilson is the attorney for the NC Department of Public Instruction and he is always interested in evidence of wrong doing by any state educators. Mr. Wilson can start a State investigation into any alleged ethics violations and if he can determine violations took place, he can revoke a teaching license if our LEA administrators are unable or unwilling to take that action.
    The United States Department of Education Title IX OCR division can also start an independent investigation if all local avenues of communication and evidence are ignored and a complaint is filed.
    The OCR could also start a compliance review if requested and look at all of these cases over the past 7 years if the requestor suggests a compliance review.
    http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/index.html?src=mr
    It is extremely frustrating to sit on your hands if you know children are at risk. Parents need a voice and here are a few options that can be considered if no one in a position of authority is listening or knows what to do. The OCR will assist the LEA on the proper way to handle these issues if the LEA will cooperate.
    I hope this information is helpful, good luck and God Bless every one that cares about protecting children and good teachers.

    Reply
  4. William's avatarWilliam

    Well, that is good information Shoe, and as the saying goes: “what’s good for the goose…” I am certain that the teachers at Lewisville will be contacting your person to report unethical behavior on the part of those teachers who accused Mr, Snow in the first place, and then their unethical collaboration with the folks who are supposed to be impartially investigating this case.

    Reply

Leave a reply to SHOE Cancel reply