Now That’s More Like a Leader

A while ago I wrote a post saying that President Bush could take a lesson in leadership from Mark Cuban, the owner of the Dallas Mavericks.  Basically I was impressed by the guts that Cuban exhibited when he took responsibility for some of the bad personnel moves made by the team over the last few years.  To paraphrase he said, "I was wrong and I’m going to learn from my mistakes."

According to an article on the Washington Post website, today at a press conference the president made the following comments:

"Katrina exposed serious problems in our response capability at all
levels of government," Bush said at a joint White House news conference
with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani. "To the extent the federal
government didn’t fully do its job right, I take responsibility."

Bush’s comments came in response to a reporter’s question as
to whether the United States was capable of handling another terrorist
attack in light of its sluggish and inadequate response to a natural
disaster like Katrina, which unlike a terrorist attack came with some
warning.

"Are we capable of dealing with a severe
attack? That’s a very important question and it’s in the national
interest that we find out what went on so we can better respond," Bush
said. He repeated his earlier assertions that he wanted to know both
what went right and went wrong with the federal response to the
disaster.

That’s a big step for the president in that it’s the first time I can recall him publicly admitting that he or his administration has made a mistake.  Now hopefully he can follow it up with even more leadership, like:

  • Getting rid of some of the sycophants he’s surrounded himself with, or at least balance them out with people who will give him the bad news as well as the good.
  • Making the hard decisions needed to fix the problems that the government’s response to Katrina exposed.
  • Finding any more Michael Brown’s who might have gotten their leadership positions due to Republican influence or fundraising abilities and quietly getting rid of them. He should do what some traditional Japanese businesses do to executives they feel are failures; give them a beautiful office with a nice view and absolutely nothing to do.  Their egos won’t let them stay around long.
  • Calling Rep. Virginia Foxx (see this post) and getting some advice about doing the right thing, both conscientiously and politically.

I’m not holding my breath, but today’s press conference does show that anything’s possible.

Voting Your Conscience: Potentially Politically Priceless

The elected representative to the US Congress from my home district is Virginia Foxx, who won a hotly contested Republican primary last year by defeating Winston-Salem’s blogging city councilman Vernon Robinson.  Until now I’d say that’s been the most newsworthy part of her political career.

Well now she’s done gone and made a name for herself.  She’s one of just 11 US Representatives who voted against the $52 billion emergency-appropriation bill for Katrina victims.  In an article in the Winston-Salem Journal she’s quoted as saying:

"I want to know that
there are safeguards and that there won’t be abuses, and I have to do
what I think is the right thing to do," she said…

Foxx argued that it
would be better to allocate the money in stages. The government’s
approach to spending on Katrina sets a bad precedent for how it deals
with future disasters, she said.

In a sign that voting her conscience might have also been a shrewd political move for Foxx, all 12 of the comments that the story garnered on the paper’s website (as of 5:48 p.m., September 13, 2005) were in support of Foxx’s vote.

Me thinks Ms. Foxx might be getting a call for advice from some of her Republican counterparts in the near future.

Just Being a Professor Doesn’t Make You Smart

There’s a quote from a professor in an article in the Arizona Republic titled "iPod Era of Personal Media Choices May Be Turning Us Into an iSolation Nation that I think highlights the dangers of listening to an academic make pronouncements about the cultural impact of, well, anything related to the real world.  Here it is:

"What concerns me is that we are developing an information
segregation," said Jeffrey McCall, a communications professor and media
watcher at DePauw University in Indiana "People are ending up exposing
themselves only to the ideas, issues and entertainment that suits them.
And I don’t think that’s healthy in the long run."

What universe is this guy from?  People have always segregated themselves and they have always segregated their information, no matter the medium.

To give you just one example take the newspaper scene in Washington, DC.  For years there have been two papers, The Washington Post and The Washington Times.  Ask any native of DC and they’ll tell you that the average Post reader is likely to be liberal and perhaps a little elitist.  On the other hand they’ll tell you that the average Times reader is either a staunch conservative, black or both.

Look at TV news. We haven’t always had the "conservative" media like Fox, but we have had choices.  Back in the day you could often be classified by the broadcast news you watched.  Were you a Cronkite guy or a Brinkley gal?

All we have with the new media is a lot more variety, more complexity and perhaps more defined segments to choose from.  So what if you TiVo your TV programming now?  That just means that instead of going to the fridge during a commercial you fast forward through it.  So what if you listen to your iPod instead of the radio?  That just means you find your music through avenues other than the 50 or 60 songs being rotated ad nauseum on the radio.

Sounds to me that Mr. McCall is a member of the camp who feels that we need to be nannied to death.  We can’t possibly enlighten ourselves, we must rely on someone else to do it for us.  But that ignores the other great human trait we all share and that is curiosity.

As I said people have always segregated themselves but we’ve also always been a curious lot.  Anyone who argues that just because we can choose what we want to hear or read and thus will never find "new" music or ideas has obviously never been stuck in their car listening to the same mix CD for a few hours on end.  We’re human, we get bored and we’re constantly on the hunt for something new. 

The almost infinite number of choices at our disposal are a great thing.  We now have an idea of how much we don’t know, the scope of what we may be missing.  I’d argue that with our curiosity piqued we will actually broaden our horizons.  Sure we’ll still be looking for those pundits we agree with and for the music we already know we like, but in the process we’ll more than likely discover something new that we like more than we ever expected.  What could be better than that?

Reading List September 12, 2005

  • Swimming to New Orleans (AlterNet via Moore’s Lore) – A first-hand account of a New Orleans native’s venture back into the city the weekend after Katrina.
  • Hurricane Katrina Timeline (PMwiki) – A wiki with a timeline of the Katrina disaster.  Fascinating, even if a third of it is factually off (which I doubt) due to the "citizens media" aspect of this, it’s a damning statement on the performance of the US government.

Bleeping Government!

Someone has put together a wiki called "Hurricane Katrina Timeline" and it’s cured me of the malaise I was beginning to feel;  I’m pretty much ticked off all over again.

For those of you not familiar with them wikis are a kind of "open" website that allows people to contribute to them and edit them freely.  What that means is that you get multiple authors and some will get their facts wrong, or even intentionally write misleading or erroneous contributions.  They are usually corrected by other contributors so the net effect is that you quickly get a comprehensive "document" from multiple sources.

I would never source a wiki for a court case or a research paper, but in general they are reliable sources of information in general.  In this case if even 50% of the information is correct it’s a damning statement about the performance of the US government in response to the Katrina disaster.

Chicago is My Kinda Town

I’ve been in Chicago the last couple of days on business.  Every time I come here I’m reminded how much I like visiting, especially when it’s 80 degrees and sunny.

Our hotel, the Hotel Monaco, is kind of funky which is a nice change of pace.  My client doesn’t like the business part of it much (the meeting room is way too hot), but the staff is courteous and my room is very comfortable.  They provide robes, and since my room is a kind of Africa theme my robe is "leopard spot" design.

The hotel’s location is right on the Loop and the Magnificent Mile and other attractions are an easy walk. This is also the first hotel I’ve stayed in that provides free Wi-Fi throughout the hotel, including individual rooms.  No need to hook into an old ISDN set up!

I definitely recommend the hotel if you’re traveling for fun or if you just need a room while on a business trip, but probably wouldn’t recommend it for any kind of larger (over 10 people) business meeting.

Working dinners this week were at House of Blues, where the food was surprisingly good and then at the Mid-America Club on the 80th floor of the Aon building.  We had a great guy from South Africa at our table at the Mid-America Club and he was thrilled to be that high up for dinner…apparently the tallest building in South Africa is 50-something stories.

All-in-all it’s been a great business trip.  Now I just have to figure out how to convince Celeste that it’s actually business and not pleasure:)

Reading List September 5, 2005

  • The Age of Cheap Oil and Easy Ignorance is Over (Dave’s Travels) – Dave says we need to share responsibility for creating the situation that led to the disastrous response to the aftermath of the Katrina disaster.
  • What Dave Said (Rex Hammock) – Rex, who is Dave’s (see above) political polar opposite, says that people with opposite political leanings, but similar "foundational convictions" end up coming full circle to meet each other.
  • You Can’t Cross-Examine a Hurricane (Is that Legal? via Ed Cone) – I’ll let the post speak for itself: "Mike Chertoff is probably one of the 2 or 3 smartest people I have ever known…
    Mike Chertoff is a career prosecutor, and an outstanding one by any
    measure. He is a law enforcement guy in every fiber of his being. It’s
    how he made his name…Mike Chertoff doesn’t know natural disasters.  This is why he would say, without seeing the absurdity of it, that a hurricane followed by breached levees was an unforeseeable succession of catastrophes, rather than foreseeable parts of the same catastrophe…So what do I think? I think that we are seeing what happens when a
    career prosecutor tries his hand at civilian disaster relief. And more
    generally, I think we are seeing what happens when a nation gets so
    fixated on its human enemies that it forgets its other vulnerabilities."
  • Bush’s Hurricane Response Time (Joe Write) – Joe compare’s the time it took Bush to get on the ground after different hurricanes.
  • War on Error (Doc Searls) – Doc describes quite well the issues we face as our national priorities change and we focus on the politics of governance as well as the politics of elections.  Yes, they are different.
  • The Scandal of Katrina (Buzz Machine) – Jeff Jarvis has quotes from two sources, one an editorial from the Times-Picayune and the other an interview with the president of Jefferson Parish that call for the immediate firing/replacement of the leaders of FEMA.  They offer compelling testimony for why this is necessary now, not later. Not sure if I agree with them, but like I said it is compelling.
  • The Bursting Point (New York Times) – David Brooks compares the current climate in America to the 70s; he doesn’t think it’s quite as bad thanks to a robust economy, but he thinks it’s still bad enough that we’ll see political changes.  Personally I’m wondering if the economy might start looking like the 70s too.
  • The Unsinkable Data Center (business2blog) – Seems that there’s a data center in New Orleans that has stayed operational throughout the disaster thanks to a diesel generator and a deeply buried cable.  An employee has kept his blog going throughout as well.  A full article from a Wired magazine about the center is here.  And in the ironic news of the day, the data center was built by Enron:)

Next Elections Could Make for Radical Change

Before you read the rest of this let me say that I know that emotions are running high in America right now, but that said I think we’re all going to have some strong convictions as a result of the national trauma we’ve experienced over the last week.

In a post I wrote a couple of days ago I said that I’m ready to get busy working so that our next round of elections get us a better set of leaders than our current crop, leaders that can make sure our government actually does the bare minimum of providing protection, care and comfort in a time of crisis.  (Please note that if I lived in Louisiana I’d be working, after things have settled down, to get rid of everyone from bottom to top, but since I don’t I’m going to focus on those I can actually vote for.  The leadership has failed at all levels here.) Well, it looks like there are some other online writers who feel the same way.  Here’s the list of those I’ve come across, some liberal and some conservative.  I’ll update if I find more.  It is followed by some quotes I found to be enlightening or thought provoking:

Here are some quotes:

"When the blaming stops and
the fixing truly begins, we’ll need more than our government
organizations to step forward. As citizens, and as groups of citizens,
will need to do what government simply can’t do.

Yes, we need bureaucracies. But bureaucracies can’t imagine anything. Including predictable acts of God.

People, on the other hand, can.

In the War on Error, people will need to take the lead. Governments will need to follow or get out of the way."

Doc Searls

The twin blows of 9/11 and Katrina are a wake up call for our
country.  We aren’t all that.  We are humans just like all the other
humans living on planet earth.  We are vulnerable like everyone else.
We may be be a "superpower" but what is that worth if we can’t protect
our own citizens?

I hope and believe that we are on the cusp of a new political
order.  We’ve had the liberal excesses of the democrat’s run from the
depression through Vietnam.  We’ve had the conservative excesses of the
republican’s run from Vietman through Iraq.

It’s time we get back to electing people to govern who know
something about leading, operating, and managing.  We need pragmatic
moderates who make the hard decisions without caring about the
political impact. We need civil servants in the mold of George
Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, and Dwight Eisenhower.  We need people who
care about the details of governing rather than the details of getting
elected.

–Fred Wilson

The ultimate donation every American can make is at the ballot box.
We need a gov’t filled with people that care and put caring about
people above everything else. This isn’t a political party issue,
rather an issue at the individual level.

When you go to the ballot box and before you make that pick, just ask yourself this:

“If I was in trouble from a 9/11 or Katrina situation, would this
person care? Would they go bananas with making sure I and my fellow
Americans were taken care of?”

Put aside all others issues because this one really matters. It realy can “happen here” and likely will happen again.

We need a gov’t that cares. It really is that simple.

–Rick Segal

We got the government we deserve, all of us, not just the
Republicans. If we’re going to eschew blame, let’s not blame people
who, like us, voted against someone they didn’t think would be a good
president. There were ample reasons to think that Gore and Kerry would
not have been good for our country.

If we have to blame anyone, let’s take the blame ourselves. We
thought we could get by without getting involved. If ever it was
obvious that we must get involved, now is that time. First there are
people to help, so many, that we must all help. Then there’s a city to
rebuild, and that’s going to require a shift in thinking about the
environment. There’s no maybe about it. On Meet The Press yesterday, a
panel of people who clearly know what they’re talking about said that
New Orleans’s present is the future for all coastal cities. A rising
ocean level has the same effect for coastal cities as dropping land
level (which is what happened in New Orleans). We have to change our
way of life if we want New York, Boston, Houston, Miami, Seattle, San
Francisco and Los Angeles to survive. And that’s true of every coastal
city in every country, not just the United States.

–Dave Winer

I guess I’m one of "those people," (however my voting record is clearly
bi-partisan), but when it comes to fundamental and foundational
convictions, I guess Dave and I prove that political persuasions, like
the earth, can be round. When it comes to philosophical or political
arguments, two people can head in opposite directions and go as far
away from one-another as can be imagined. But when they share certain
fundamental convictions regarding character and responsibility and
mutual-respect, they often find themselves meeting up with one other on
the opposite side of their perceived differences.

–Rex Hammock

CNN skewers
the astonishing claim by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
— who’s apparently channeling Bush’s earlier lie that no one
anticpated the levee failures — that government planners couldn’t have
predicted the disaster, when exactly these predictions abounded over
the years.

And Knight Ridder looks at the political crony background
of the grossly unqualified — and, as we’ve seen in the past week,
flagrantly incompetent — head of the Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Michael Brown. Naturally, Bush effusively praised this
character during the week, just one more tone-deaf demonstration from
the president.

Now the administration is doing everything it can to shift all responsibility for error
onto the local officials, as the Washington Post reports today. Such
stand-up people, these unnamed characters assassins for a government
that couldn’t pull its act together for long, cruel days, when events
demanded an instant response in the absence of actual planning.

Yes, there’s responsibility to go around in state and local circles. But the federal failings are simply horrendous.

Meanwhile, the heroes keep on working: the police and National Guard
and doctors and nurses and battalions of people who are doing their
jobs at great personal cost. They humble the rest of us. And they shame
the government "leaders" — or would, if shame was a meaningful concept
to the people at the top of the pyramid.

–Dan Gillmor

The first rule of the social fabric – that in times of crisis you
protect the vulnerable – was trampled. Leaving the poor in New Orleans
was the moral equivalent of leaving the injured on the battlefield. No
wonder confidence in civic institutions is plummeting…

Katrina means that the political culture, already sour and
bloody-minded in many quarters, will shift. There will be a reaction.
There will be more impatience for something new. There is going to be
some sort of big bang as people respond to the cumulative blows of bad
events and try to fundamentally change the way things are.

Reaganite conservatism was the response to the pessimism and
feebleness of the 1970’s. Maybe this time there will be a progressive
resurgence. Maybe we are entering an age of hardheaded law and order.
(Rudy Giuliani, an unlikely G.O.P. nominee a few months ago, could now
win in a walk.) Maybe there will be call for McCainist patriotism and
nonpartisan independence. All we can be sure of is that the political
culture is about to undergo some big change.

We’re not really at a tipping point as much as a bursting point. People are mad as hell, unwilling to take it anymore.

–David Brooks

Amazing Web Site for Tracking Katrina Damage

There’s a website called scipionus.com that is a "mashup" of a wiki (an "open" website that allows users to add information themselves) and Google maps that allows people to input data about conditions at specific addresses on the map.

If you go to the site click on any of the balloons in an area you’re interested in, then zoom in.  You can see that people are putting in an address and then information like, "Wind damage, no power and no flooding.  Looting is rampant, pure anarchy."

As Steven Leavitt of Freakonomics describes the site:

"Surfing around, the devastation doesn’t seem as bad on the wiki as it
does on TV. Houses a block or two from Lake Pontchartrain with no
flooding, for instance. This shouldn’t be surprising. TV is only
showing us the worst. The people in good enough shape to be entering
info on the website are probably heavily selected towards those who
fared well. The truth is probably somewhere in between."