Category Archives: Weblogs

I’m Number 3!

So yesterday I’m procrastinating on my real work and looking at the referral stats for this blog.  I notice that I’m getting some click throughs from Google to my "Drink More Ovaltine" post.  So I check it out and sure enough at some point yesterday my blog, specifically that page of my blog, ranked number three on Google for the term "Ovaltine."

I’ve heard that blogs do incredibly well with natural search, but I truly find this amazing, and in a way troubling.

Here’s why it’s troubling to me:

  1. I don’t drink Ovaltine, and I don’t know anyone who does.  Now there are several Ovaltine drinkers out there who have found me, and I’m afraid of what they might do if they find out I drink two pots of coffee a day.
  2. I don’t currently have AdSense running on this site.  If I did I might have generated a couple of clicks worth at least four or five cents.  I’m always troubled when I miss opportunities for great wealth.
  3. Considering some of the other headlines I’ve written I’m kind of worried about what else I might be ranking high for, and consequently the kind of folks I might be attracting to this blog.  In particular I’m worried about the terms "doodle" (slight pornographic connotation), "courting" (same reason, at least for the fundamentalists out there), "litigious idiots" (way too many lawyers know how to read, and at least two have heard of the internet), and finally "State of the Union" (need I explain?).

Well, all told I’m probably not half as troubled as the poor director of marketing at Ovaltine who’s getting spanked on Google by a semi-literate blogger who doesn’t even want the ranking. 

Drink more Ovaltine indeed!

Update: Fred Wilson at AVC points out the "underwhelming" performance of Google AdSense.  I definitely agree with his point.

Greensboro N&R’s Letters to the Editor Blog: The Triad’s National Enquirer

Alot of bloggers have commented on the rowdy Greensboro News & Record’s "Letters to the Editor" blog.  Many are lamenting the lack of civility, the nasty posts made by people hiding behind their pseudonyms, etc. 

Me?  I love watching people with firmly held beliefs trying to convince someone else with equally firmly held, yet opposite beliefs that they are in fact wrong about their firmly held beliefs.  This debate about torture is a prime example.

I’m sure this isn’t what John Robinson and company were striving for, but I feel the same guilty pleasure reading this blog as I do when I read the National Enquirer in the grocery store check out.  Of course I’m sure John & company would love the Enquirer’s circulation!

Any Prominent Bloggers in Winston-Salem?

I’m putting together a list of Winston-Salem bloggers.  I’ve spent a couple of hours searching various local blogrolls, regional blog indexes, Google, you name it.  I now have a whopping list of four and they are all personal-ish blogs.  (I do like them and have posted them on the left column.)

Unfortunately I can’t find a single Winston-Salem public figure with a blog.  Where are the journalists, politicians or gadflies?  Our friends to the east in Greensboro are chock-full of public figure bloggers.  Here’s a few just off the top of my head:

John Robinson (Editor, News & Record)
Tom Phillips (Greensboro City Councilman)
Ed Cone (Columnist for the News & Record)
David Hoggard  (I think he falls into all three of the aforementioned categories)

Greensboro also has an experimental blog-aggregator-cum-alternative-daily-news-source, Greensboro101, that is positioning itself as a kind of Peoples Choice for local news.

All of which leads me to two questions:

1. Are there any Winston-Salem public figures with a blog? (Actually can anyone point me to any good Winston-Salem blogs?)

2. Did all of Greensboro’s public figures come to blogs because there was already a vibrant blogging community in place, or were they a catalyst for the development of Greensboro’s blogging community?  I know it’s kind of a chicken-egg question, but I’m curious.

***Update***
After another Feedster search I’ve found quite a few personal blogs, mostly by students at Wake Forest.  Not adding them to the list and have now determined that I’m going to have to come up with a totally arbitrary vetting process for the list.  Still no public figures.

Virginia Postrel Has a Point About Blogging, er Writing

In her blog Virginia Postrel comments on Andrew Sullivan’s decision to give up his blog.  Here’s what she said:

Even the few brilliant scholars (Tyler Cowen, Eugene Volokh, Grant McCracken) who make blogging seem like it should
foster serious thought limit their posting to topics they want to mull
over in public. Current-affairs blogging of the
Sullivan/Instapundit/name your favorite type is inherently quick,
dirty, and disposable. It may add to the public discourse, but it
doesn’t tend to deepen the blogger’s own thinking. That, plus sheer
laziness, is why this blog has never promised more than a few posts a
week, and why I’ve given up my think-magazine-editor instincts to voice
an opinion on everything. For a full-blown argument, I want to write
something for a sizable audience and get paid. And I don’t really want
to post half-baked ones.

Right now, I’m researching a couple of long-term projects–one
on variety and one on glamour–and (barely) financing the research,
which involves some travel and reporting, with article assigments.
Blogging will be quite light through February."

She’s quite right.  Although I think you can support the point that "instapundit" blogging (er, writing) is very time consuming.  That’s because the best "instpundits" seem to be the most well-read, insatiable consumers of comments, fact, fiction, news, rumors, innuendo, etc.  They "cut" the pieces they like, "paste" it in their blogs (or columns, or whatever), reference the original and then spice it with their own comments.

Sounds simple but like anything done well it takes time, toil and talent.  And anything that takes the three Ts generally leads to burnout.  And honestly I think it leads to readers’ grazing as well; we get bored of the same-old, same-old.  Our appetite changes and we move on to other writers, covering the same issues, but perhaps in a pithier manner.

Which leads me to think that the blogs, er writers, with legs will actually be those with consistent depth and thoughtfulness, not necessarily those with a focus on rapidity and breadth.  That helps keep the reader and writer focused and engaged.

Final point: I’m also beginning to think that we will all begin to feel RSS overload. I know I am.  I’m deleting feeds left and right because I just can’t read them all.  Which do I keep?  Let’s just say that most of the feeds I keep average 3 or fewer posts a day.

My Hometown Paper?

This is something that’s been on my mind:

I live in Winston-Salem. I have the Winston-Salem Journal delivered every morning.  But I don’t feel like I know anyone there.  The paper doesn’t have a "voice",  at least not one that I can hear.  The closest thing to its voice is the editor’s column in the op-ed section.

In fairness to the Journal I think that the "voice" issue is the same for the vast majority of newspapers.  But unfortunately for the Journal they happen to be juxtaposed with the Greensboro News & Record. The N&R is making national (maybe even international) headlines, at least in the publishing sector and the nascent blogosphere, because it is embracing the newest in publishing paradigms: the blog.

At last count the N&R has five blogs: one written by the editor John Robinson, another written by Lex Alexander (I think he’s their online guru), another titled Inside Scoop, a sports blog written by multiple sports staffers, and finally The Chalkboard blog which covers local education stories.

I get all of the N&R blogs via RSS.  I don’t get their paper…yet.  But I still feel closer to the N&R, and in a way I feel it is my hometown paper.  And I think it’s going to eat the Journal’s lunch if the folks at the Journal don’t act fast.  Here’s why:

1. Via it’s blogs the N&R has been getting direct feedback from it’s audience (notice I didn’t say readers) about how they would like to see their "paper" evolve in the future.  The N&R is doing a fantastic job of helping their audience take ownership of the paper.  This is huge because…

2. Paper circulation is on its last legs as the defining metric for local newspaper companies.  They are going to have to morph to survive;  there will probably be paper for the foreseeable future, but it’s role as the core entity for the company is declining rapidly.  To morph the newspaper needs to know what it’s audience wants and then create it.  N&R is doing that, and in the process they are replacing the monologue with a dialogue.

3. N&R already owns two thirds of the Piedmont Triad region (Greensboro & High Point).   Denizens of Winston-Salem see themselves as quite distinct from the denizens of Greensboro, which is very similar to the attitude of Northern Virginians to Suburban Marylanders in the D.C. area that I recently fled.  Anyway, it would probably pain the editor at the Journal (I have no idea what his/her name is) to know that I feel like I’m on a first name basis with the editor of the Greensboro News & Record (Hi John!).  If I happen across a hot story or issue, who do you think I’m going to ping with it?

4. The future for newspapers is integrated media.  I have no idea what the mix will be, but it’s going to be some combination of paper, internet, video, audio and interactive media. 

My brother works for a major newspaper publishing company and he pointed out to me years ago that the real money for community papers is in classifieds.  At the time his company wasn’t too worried about the internet because it was a glogal entity.  Enter Craigs List.  Oops.

My point is that newspapers are sitting on the cusp of something big and they will either thrive or die.  Right now they still own a healthy part of the audience, but they need only look at their declining circulation to know that the audience share is shrinking.  They have to act now.  N&R is doing that, and they are doing it right.

5. Last point.  I hear from the N&R several times every day, all via their blogs.  I hear from the Journal in the morning and that’s it.  I used to check their website for updates, but rarely saw them.  (Honestly their site stinks).  As a result I know more about Greensboro’s city council than I do about Winston-Salem’s.

So for now I’d say that the N&R is my hometown paper.  It’s not too late for the Journal, but they better act fast or it will be.  I’d love to write the editor and share some ideas…anybody have a name for me?

PressThink: More Undercurrent: Action in Greensboro on Open Source Journalism

Link: PressThink: More Undercurrent: Action in Greensboro on Open Source Journalism.

This article from Pressthink is about the evolving blogging scene in Greensboro, NC which is part of the Piedmont Triad along with Winston-Salem and High Point.

Seems that what the editors at the Greensboro News & Record are trying to do is unique in the newspaper business.  As the article says:

With the local blogging scene rapidy coalescing
on its own, the local newspaper, led by a blogging boss, decides to
act. He wants to remake the site as "an online community or public
square."

And later they cite an email from the paper’s Lex Alexander:

…in many ways we’ve waited 10 years to do this and aren’t going to
wait any longer. My report is due next Friday, and we intend to begin
changing things on Jan. 3. And my editor has made it clear that even
though this effort will have to come out of existing resources, he’s
willing to divert to make this happen. He’s not looking for marginal,
incremental change, but transformative, revolutionary change.

It’s going to be very interesting to see how this local experiment affects the rest of the newspaper universe.

Continue reading