Author Archives: Jon Lowder

Reading List August 19, 2005

Reading List August 18, 2005

  • Innovating Once Again (A VC) – Fred Wilson points to Tom Evslin’s efforts to self-publish his book, but in a whole new way.  Fred calls it "Books 2.0" which is a play on the "Web 2.0" that is the du jour tech movement.
  • Self Publish or Perish (Fractals of Change) – Tom Evslin explains how he’s going to self -publish (see above), and also refrences some other notable self publishers in the online world.
  • WSJ: Self-Publish or Be Damned? Not Always (Andy Kessler) – The author recounts his self-publishing education and success.
  • Advice for Authors (Seth Godin) – Seth has some insights into publishing, best of which is publishing houses do best with authors that are already successful without them.
  • Media no More (Jeff Jarvis) – This is a very good post in which Jeff explores the world of media, and takes a hard look at what is happening to media as we know it.  In a nutshell he points out that in the case of non-fiction media is becoming conversational, or better put it is becoming two-way instead of one-way.  He also looks at what is happening in the fictional world and why he seems less patient with the oldest medium, the book, yet still wants to write one.
  • Enjoy Your Laundry (The Post Money Value) – A post about a positive customer experience.  The author has been staying at a Hampton Inn (which he gave positive reviews in a post last week) but they don’t have laundry facilities.  They sent him to the Embassy Suites next door, which led to a memorably good encounter with Shiela, the person manning the desk at Embassy Suites.  Let’s just say that they’re getting some of his business in the future.
  • Luxury’s Long Tail (Fast Company) – Is it still luxury if everyone can get one?
  • Einsteinovation (Reveries.com) – Even the most esoteric scientific ideas can have an impact on the real world.
  • Building the Perfect Team (Always On) – Tips on building a team at an entrepreneurial company, written by a serial entrepreneur.

I Thought Doctors Were Supposed to Be Smart

I was reading an article in Wall Street Journal online (via Ed Cone) about how Aetna is getting ready to publish the prices it has negotiated for physician services in the Cincinatti area on its website and I came across this sentence:

The negotiated fees typically are discounted from
the list prices that doctors charge uninsured patients, and are
available only to Aetna and its plan members.

This is literally stupid.  Aetna’s customers, and those from other insurers, are going to cost the doctors more than the uninsured patients and it will take the doctors much longer to get paid.  Doctors literally have to employ people to do the paperwork required by the insurance companies, and then they have to handle disputed claims and wait forever to get paid.  An uninsured, or "cash" patient walks in the door, is seen, pays his bill and walks out.  Hmm, I wonder which patient offers a higher profit margin even at the same billing rate?

Now maybe the doctors are afraid to lower their "list" rates for fear that they will lose bargaining room with the insurance companies.  Fine, then offer the cash patients discounts and incentives. The doctors would look like they were giving the patients a bargain AND they would have higher profit margins to boot.

In the doctors’ defense until recently they haven’t had much of an incentive to behave like they were running a business.  A huge proportion of their patients came from the insurance companies, and if someone was uninsured they probably couldn’t afford to pay anyway.  Well, times are a-changing with the advent of consumer driven health plans like Health Savings Accounts, and doctors better adjust, quickly.

Here’s my recommendation:

  • Keep list prices the same but set up a pricing schedule specifically for "cash" customers.  Factor in which run-of-the-mill services offer the greatest retun on time (investment) and use incentives for those services in your marketing efforts.
  • Oh yeah, start marketing.
  • Offer discounts for multiple family members.  For instance a pediatrician could offer lower rates on physicals for siblings if all the siblings came in at one time.
  • Institute a customer service plan.  Follow up with patients and find out how they felt about their appointment.  Survey the patients to find out what they think of the office, if they had to wait too long, etc. 
  • Get used to the idea that patients will begin to "shop" you, but also be aware that patients are savvy.  They won’t choose a doctor on price alone, but they also won’t pay top dollar for a doctor they perceive as "Wal-Mart" if they can get a "Macys" doctor for the same price.

Actually the best advice I can give is for any doctor to check out my dentist’s operation.  The folks at Kingery & Kingery have it figured out, and as a cash customer I speak from personal experience.

First, they do a great job marketing themselves (that’s how we found them).  Second they have a very professional and friendly staff.  Third, the doctors actually listen. 

A perfect example of this came earlier this month when I was in for a cleaning. Dr. Kingery was telling me about all kinds of nifty things he could do to improve my smile and I said, "Listen, I have three kids going into braces in the next three years.  I don’t want to spend a dime that isn’t necessary on my own mouth, so just tell me what you think is absolutely necessary."  And he did.

Last, they have a follow up system in place to make sure that their customers are happy.  As part of that process they worked with us on pricing out all the different things we were going to have done.  With three kids with questionable brushing skills and two middle-aged parents who need to get old fillings repaired my family is literally a cash cow for them, and so they are making every effort to keep us around. If they don’t we can just go down the road, and they know it.

Are you listening doctors?  This is your future.

Reading List August 17, 2005

  • A New Dimension? (A VC) – A venture capitalist looks at what’s next in web/software services, and he thinks it is "relevance."
  • VC Cliche of the Week: The Short List (A VC) – How companies looking for a round of funding should build their short list of prospects.
  • Smart Islands = Stupid Groups (The Post Money Value) – Canada Air ticks off the author by not accepting a discount offer he received because it is "web-only" and despite the fact that the website is down.
  • Barnes and Noble: Usted tiene una pista? (The Post Money Value) – A Barnes and Noble store in Burbank posts a sign intended for their hispanic customers, but written in English.
  • It’s Time to Talk Trash (Micro Persuasion) – CooperKatz’s newest client blog is for a company called simplehuman.  Looks interesting.
  • Fire Hose Pants (bookofjoe) – Pants made from the same material used to wrap rubber firehoses.  I need to get me some.
  • Dear Mr. Dell (Jeff Jarvis) – Jeff writes an open letter to Michael Dell about his "Dell Hell" experience and explains why he thinks Dell should become egaged in the online conversation.  Worth the read simply for the excellent articulation of why "blogging" et.al. is an important development for all businesses.

What President Bush Could Learn from Mark Cuban

I just read a post on Mark Cuban’s blog, Blog Maverick, in which he explains why he had to let go one of his best players (Michael Finley).  For non-sports fans Mark Cuban is the owner of the Dallas Mavericks an NBA franchise. 

In his post Cuban does something that you don’t see much in this day and age;  he says "I was wrong." He takes full responsibility for creating a situation that caused him to let go someone he considers a friend and someone he considered one of his best employees.  That kind of honesty takes guts and not a little bit of self awareness.  It also shows leadership.

My issue with President Bush has been his absolute inability to say, "I was wrong."  Remember last year’s campaign?  He was asked point blank if he thought he’d made any mistakes and he couldn’t bring himself to say, "Yes."  Personally I think he feared that any admission of error would lead people to believe that he had lost the courage of his convictions.

The President’s supporters often cite his courage of convictions as one of his great qualities.  I think this is a reaction to President Clinton’s perceived waffling, and was one of the characteristics that got Bush elected in the first place. But there comes a point where sticking to your convictions in the face of growing evidence that your convictions are wrong can actually have the effect of making you seem stupid, if not a conceited coward.

We’re all human, including the President.  As humans we make mistakes and one of our greatest strengths is that we can learn from them.  By not admitting that he makes mistakes the President seems to be telling the American people that he is better than us.  That’s not good because Americans like their leaders to be forceful, decisive and yet humble.

As I said President Bush could learn from Mark Cuban’s example, but since President Bush doesn’t seem to have Cuban’s self awareness I doubt he will have the ability to learn this lesson.  And for that reason I think he’s lost his ability to lead, which should make the next three years quite ugly.

My Already Scattered Brain is in Trouble

I’m a voracious reader and it takes all my self-discipline to get real work done on any given day.  That’s why a new site I found through bookofjoe is so scary to me.

It is Uchronia.net and as the site describes it this is "an annotated bibliography of over 2600 novels, stories, essays and
other printed material involving the "what ifs" of history. The genre
has a variety of names, but it’s best known as alternate history."

I love alternate history but have never really been good at finding books/stories/etc. in that genre.  I’m in trouble now.

Reading List August 16, 2005

Reading List August 15, 2005

  • How About the About Page (Post Money Value) – Why are all "About" pages the same? Technorati’s is a little different and Rick Segal likes it.
  • Orikaso Folf Flat Bowl (bookofjoe) – bookofjoe is the newest daily blog read for me.  The author is based in Charlottesville, VA and finds some of the most interesting products you can imagine.  This plastic bowl is part of a set of plastic ware that each folds to a flat sheet…perfect for travel.
  • 15th Century "Blogging" (Rexblog) – Rex Hammock links to the British Libraries digitized versions of 15th century "Festival Books."
  • Book Excerpt: Google Goes Public (John Battelle’s SearchBlog) – 1,000-word excerpt from the chapter of Battelle’s Google book that covers the IPO in 2004.
  • The Real Estate Bubble Pops Here (Moore’s Lore) – Dana Blankenhorn thinks that the real estate bubble is ready to pop, and I think he’s right.  It’s really beginning to feel like 1979.
  • Hints of Sanity (Blog on the Run) – Lex compiles a short list of pieces that feature other "traditional Republicans" (my phrasing) who take umbrage with the current Republican Party and the "moronic" Bush Administration.
  • Frimærkesprog (Reveries) – The history of the practice of using stamp placement on a letter or postcard to convey a secret message.  Believe it or not this also has something to do with why we pre-pay for stamps.
  • Open vs. Closed (A VC) –  Fred Wilson writes that hackers at MIT (in Fred’s vernacular hackers are a good thing, not the criminal types most commonly associated with the term) understood the value of "open" systems over 40 years ago.  Now the general public is beginning to see the value through services like Flickr and del.icio.us, and as Fred says, "It’s about time."
  • "The subject matter varies but the governing sensibility remains consistent" (bookofjoe) – Joe republishes a post describing a magazine that launched in 1996 and just published its 7th issue. That’s my kind of publishing schedule. The subject of the post is the author’s description of the magazine, which should be writ in stone above the desk, or wherever any publisher/editor will see it every hour of her working life.

The Wisdom of Sharing

In his post "A Basic Threat to the Web" Dana Blankenhorn carried a comment from Karl Auerbach,
a former ICANN governor
and what Dana calls a "certified "good guy" of Internet governance."  The comment originally appeared on Dave Farber’s list, and I excerpt it here:

I’ve become concerned with how search engine companies are making a
buck off of web-based works without letting the authors share in the
wealth.

I’ve looked at my web logs and noticed the intense degree to which
search engine companies dredge through my writings – which are
explicitly marked as copyrighted and published subject to a clearly
articulated license.

The search engine companies take my works and from those they create  derivative works.

The search engine companies don’t ask my permission. Rather they
presume that they have the right to create these derivative works
unless I create an explicit denial via a robots.txt file.

The search engine companies generate revenue by making use of the
derivative works they have created from my original works. I, as the
author and copyright owner of the underlying work, am not given any
share of that revenue stream.

Yes, I gain visibility because the search engines create means to find my writings.

Perhaps that would be a reasonable bargain to make – if the  opportunity to make such a bargain were actually presented…

I am increasingly coming to the opinion that some portion of the
revenues received by search engine companies should flow to the
creators and copyright holders of the original works that are indexed
via the derivative works made by the search engines.

I have to take serious issue with this line of thinking.  Here’s my thinking:

  • I truly believe that anything posted online by its owner qualifies for "fair use."  As a web user you know that the search engines are there; if you don’t want your work to be found, shared, etc. then don’t post it.

    I understand the argument that the search engines are essentially making a presumptive deal by aggregating the content and then allowing content creators to opt out, but I disagree with that for the mere reason that by physically posting your content online you are taking the first step in making the deal.  If you don’t post it there’s nothing to aggregate.

  • Search engines provide a service that is monetarily free to users on both sides of the equation, unless you’re utilizing paid search listings.  Check your web logs and figure out how many visitors came from search engines and most likely you’ll find it is the majority. 

    So you’re getting traffic/exposure that you didn’t have to pay a penny for. But nothing in life is free, so the "price" we pay is that we allow the search engines to use our content under the terms of fair use and let them figure out how to make money.  Without money they die. Without them the web dies, or at least atrophies.

  • In his post Dana points out that if everyone takes the point of view that the search engines should share the revenue and if they don’t they’ll pull back their content, then the search engines will have nothing left to search and the afore mentioned atrophy will occur.  Personally I don’t see the business or creative masses being that shortsighted.

    Take traditional publishing companies.  Over the last 10 years they have been struggling with their business models, asking questions like "Should we put all of our content behind a secure site and charge access ala The Wall Street Journal?" or "If we make all our content free how do we make money?"  What they are finally figuring out is how to work with the web and not against it.  They are finding that magic mix of "free" content and "premium" content.  A prime example is what Anne Holland is doing over at MarketingSherpa (Full Disclosure: Anne used to be a client).

    Without the search engines these same publishers would be in trouble.  They’ve figured out that if they make a certain amount of content freely available then the search engines will help potential customers beat a path to their door.  It is up to them to figure out how to make those customers pay, and they are doing it increasingly well.

  • Finally I have to say that the current environment provides content creators with an opportunity they couldn’t have dreamed of even 15 years ago.  I think the average writer of 15 years ago would have laughed uproariously at the complaint that someone had provided free exposure for her content, but damnit they didn’t pay me for it!  Back then if you weren’t published you weren’t read.  Now you can sign up for a free blog account, the search engines love you and some kid in India who may be the next great entrepreneur is reading your stuff.

    As Dana says, "I know, I know, we’d all like to be compensated for what we write. But
    that’s what business models are for. Not just advertising, but paid
    writing, speeches, consulting. Works for IBM."