Some folks see grafitti and think "Now that's art" and others see it as the defacement of property. Personally I find even grafitti I like to be a defacement of someone's property unless of course the property owner invited the artist to work his magic. That's why in the realm of "unapproved" art I prefer something that's creative, easily removable and inherently temporary. Here's a great example:
Then there's the stuff that's approved and is anything but art. Like cell towers disguised as trees.
Discover more from Befuddled
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
