Eelymosynary?

Ed Cone channeled George Will in the comments on one of his own blog posts.  The post yesterday was about John Edwards withdrawing from the Democratic presidential campaign and it attracted Ed’s usual crowd of commentors, a few of whom began questioning Edwards’ championing of the poor (i.e. he’s a rich hypocrite) and others who defended him.  Anyway, here’s an excerpt from Ed’s comment that had me running to my dictionary (okay, looking it up on Dictionary.com):

Poverty itself demands structural approaches, beyond any eelymosynary remedies applied to individuals or small groups. (Emphasis mine)

I don’t know what John Edwards gives to charity. I don’t think he
has to give most of his money away, certainly at this point in his life
and his children’s lives, to be considered charitable or to show
genuine concern.

But his message as a politician is more about addressing poverty and
its structural causes than proclaiming himself the charity champion.

I tried looking up eelymosynary but I think Ed misspelled it because Dictionary.com didn’t find it but did suggest eleemosynary, an adjective which is defined as "of or pertaining to alms, charity, or charitable donations; charitable."  I can’t hold this one against Ed though since I can’t pronounce the word, much less spell it.

Anyone who’s read George Will more than once will recognize the phenomenon of having to keep a dictionary handy in order to wade through the article/editorial.  I always felt this was a weakness of his since the point in his line of work (columnist) is to effectively argue an issue, not show off his vocabulary.  If you require your readers to consult a dictionary you aren’t really communicating are you?  In other words whenever I read the guy I feel like writing him and telling him "We all know you’re that kid who was always the smartest in the class, or at least sounded like the smartest kid in the class, so quit showing off and tell us what you think in terms that more than 2% of the population understands."

Anyway, Ed rarely whips out the Willian phrasing so he’s actually a very effective communicator.  This was a classic though.


Discover more from Befuddled

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a comment