Now I’ve seen it all: McPaper is being pilloried by the likes of Michelle Malkin for running a doctored photo of Condi Rice that made her look just a tad demonic. Here’s the doctored photo (photos are
WASHINGTON (AP)):
And here’s the less-doctored photo that replaced it on the USA Today site after the stink raised by Malkin & Co., along with the editorial note from the paper:
Editor’s note: The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally
accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA
TODAY’s editorial standards. The photo has been replaced by a properly
adjusted copy. Photos published online are routinely cropped for size
and adjusted for brightness and sharpness to optimize their appearance.
In this case, after sharpening the photo for clarity, the editor
brightened a portion of Rice’s face, giving her eyes an unnatural
appearance. This resulted in a distortion of the original not in
keeping with our editorial standards.
Personally I don’t think the airbrushing can do any worse damage to Condi’s image than this picture did to W’s:
Discover more from Befuddled
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Befuddled 
I was going to comment on how funny that Bush picture is until I remembered I am not talking to you about any more male sexual related items. Although since you seem to have at least three kids, you’re probably OK.